Journal of Global Health: Home Journal of Global Health
Watch: Survival: The Story of Global Health - FREE
JoGH Recommends:

Peer Review Conference



Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution
4.0 International License
.


Kavita Singh, Shane M Khan, Liliana Carvajal–Aguirre, Paul Brodish, Agbessi Amouzou, and Allisyn Moran

Abstract

Background

Skin–to–skin contact (SSC) between mother and newborn offers numerous protective effects, however it is an intervention that has been under–utilized. Our objectives are to understand which newborns in Bangladesh and Nigeria receive SSC and whether SSC is associated with the early initiation of breastfeeding.

Methods

Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data were used to study the characteristics of newborns receiving SSC for non–facility births in Nigeria (DHS 2013) and for both facility and non–facility births in Bangladesh (DHS 2014). Multivariable logistic regression was used to study the association between SSC and early initiation of breastfeeding after controlling for key socio–demographic, maternal and newborn–related factors.

Results

Only 10% of newborns in Nigeria and 26% of newborns in Bangladesh received SSC. In the regression models, SSC was significantly associated with the early initiation of breastfeeding in both countries (OR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.15–1.76 for Nigeria; OR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.04–1.55, for Bangladesh). Findings from the regression analysis for Bangladesh revealed that newborns born by Cesarean section had a 67% lower odds of early initiation of breastfeeding than those born by normal delivery (OR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.26–0.43). Also in Bangladesh newborns born in a health facility had a 30% lower odds of early initiation of breastfeeding than those born in non–facility environments (OR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.53–0.92). Early initiation of breastfeeding was significantly associated with parity, urban residence and wealth in Nigeria. Geographic area was significant in the regression analyses for both Bangladesh and Nigeria.

Conclusions

Coverage of SSC is very low in the two countries, despite its benefits for newborns without complications. SSC has the potential to save newborn lives. There is a need to prioritize training of health providers on the implementation of essential newborn care including SSC. Community engagement is also needed to ensure that all women and their families regardless of residence, socio–economic status, place or type of delivery, understand the benefits of SSC and early initiation of breastfeeding.


Globally there were an estimated 5.9 million deaths to children under–five in the year 2015, and 45% of these deaths occurred during the neonatal period, the first month of life [1]. While there have been substantial reductions in under–five mortality, reductions in neonatal mortality have been less pronounced. From 1990 to 2015 under–five mortality fell by 52% compared to 42% for neonatal mortality [1]. The main causes of under–five mortality are now prematurity, pneumonia; and intrapartum–related conditions including birth asphyxia [2]. Notably two of the top three main causes of death occur either exclusively in the neonatal period (birth asphyxia) or mostly in the neonatal period (prematurity), while pneumonia is a cause of death for both neonates and children 1–59 months. The global health community has provided specific recommendations on essential newborn care (ENC), which refers to care provided to the newborn within the first moments to days of life [3]. Components of ENC include thermal care, early and exclusive breastfeeding, appropriate cord care and monitoring/early treatment for low birth weight or sick newborns. ENC is intended to enable countries to protect newborns through the implementation of simple, yet, life–saving interventions.

The ENC interventions focused on thermal care are intended to ensure that newborns do not develop hypothermia (state of being too cold) or hyperthermia (state of being too hot). Newborns regulate temperature less effectively and lose heat more easily compared to adults. These issues are intensified for low birth weight and premature newborns [4]. Interventions for thermal care include immediate drying, delayed bathing, head covering and skin–to–skin contact (SSC), which is the placement of a naked newborn baby prone on the mother’s bare chest soon after birth [5]. The mother and baby may be covered loosely with a blanket or cloth, preferable pre–warmed [6]. The newborn baby should remain in that position until the end of the first successful breastfeeding [5,7]. In addition to providing warmth, SSC also has numerous other benefits including improved attachment between mother and newborn [810] and the reduction of infant stress [5,11,12]. A Cochrane Review of randomized trials including mother–baby dyads, found that SSC at birth was associated with breastfeeding at one to four months post–birth with a risk ratio of 1.25. A total of 13 trials, composing of 702 mother–baby dyads, were included in the review for the breastfeeding outcomes [5]. Despite the benefits and the simplicity of SSC as a natural intervention, over time it became common practice to separate newborns from their mothers after delivery often due to routine procedures [5,135]. In 2012, the American Academy of Pediatrics stated that many maternal and newborn assessments can be done during SSC or can be delayed until after the critical SSC period, so long as the mother and newborn do not have any complications [16].

There is an increased focus on newborn health interventions among the global health community and recently some large–scale household surveys have included measures of such interventions. The use of population–based data are important, as it can provide some indication of how well a country is implementing SSC in real–life settings. Data on SSC are only currently available from a few household surveys, most recently the Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) 2013 [17] and the Bangladesh DHS 2014 [18]. These two countries together accounted for 12% of the world’s neonatal deaths [1].

The first objective of this analysis is to assess the level of practice of SSC in Nigeria and Bangladesh and to examine the characteristics of newborns who are receiving SSC. Understanding SSC by key factors is essential in efforts to improve coverage of this intervention. The second objective is to determine whether SSC is associated with the early initiation of breastfeeding, defined as breastfeeding within the first hour of life. Early initiation of breastfeeding is an important outcome to study for several reasons. First milk or colostrum is rich in protective factors including antibodies and vitamin A, and early breastfeeding is a pivotal step towards longer–term and exclusive breastfeeding [19]. Trials in Nepal and Ghana have found that early initiation of breastfeeding could prevent 19% and 22%, respectively, of neonatal deaths [20,21].

Methods

Data sources

We used data from the 2013 Nigeria DHS and the 2014 Bangladesh DHS. The DHS are a source of nationally representative data for monitoring socio–economic and health indicators at the population level. In sampled households women age 15–49 are eligible to participate, but in some countries, such as Bangladesh, only ever–married women 15–49 are eligible to participate. The sample is based on a stratified two–stage cluster design. The first stage is the sample enumeration area (SEA), and the second stage is a list of households from each SEA. The samples are representative at the national, urban/rural residence and regional levels. For both Nigeria and Bangladesh we restricted our sample to women with a live birth. For Nigeria the question on SSC was asked of the most recent birth in the past five years for non–facility births only. For Bangladesh the question on SSC was asked of the most recent birth in the past three years for both facility and non–facility births. (The specific questions are described in the section on the key independent variable.) The sample sizes were 11 966 mother–newborn pairs in Nigeria and 4444 mother–newborn pairs in Bangladesh.

Outcome variable

The dependent variable was early initiation of breastfeeding, defined as breastfeeding within one hour of birth. The question was worded the same in both Bangladesh and Nigeria: How long after birth did you first put (NAME) to the breast?

The variable was coded as “0” if more than 1 hour and “1” if one hour or less.

Key independent variable

The key independent variable was a dichotomous indicator of SSC for the most recent birth in the past three (Bangladesh) or five (Nigeria) years. The questions were slightly different between the two surveys as shown below.

Nigeria (non–facility births only): Was (Name) placed on your belly/breast before delivery of the placenta?

Bangladesh (facility and non–facility births): After the birth was (Name) put directly on the bare skin of your chest?

Another difference is that in Bangladesh the interviewers were trained to show the respondent a picture of the SSC position.

Control variables

Several maternal health variables were studied including mother’s age in years by the following age groups: 15–19, 20–24, 25–34, 35+; education (none, primary, secondary or higher); current marital status (married, not married) and parity (1, 2–3, 4+). The analysis included two socio–economic variables – urban residence and wealth quintile and a demographic variable–subnational region of residence (which were zones for Nigeria and divisions for Bangladesh). Several delivery–rated factors were studied including Cesarean delivery (yes/no: Bangladesh only); facility delivery (yes/no Bangladesh only; facility vs non–facility) and type of delivery attendant [skilled birth attendant (SBA) vs unskilled birth attendant]. SBA was defined as a doctor, nurse or midwife in accordance with the global definition. We included mother’s perceptions of her baby’s birthweight (small, average, large, large) to understand any differentials in SSC by perceived size of the baby.

Analysis

The analysis was carried out separately for each country. Bivariate analyses (using Pearson χ2 test) compared several control variables for mothers reporting SSC immediately after birth to those who did not. In multivariate logistic regressions, early breastfeeding was regressed on SSC, controlling for all of the maternal and infant–related variables mentioned in the section above.

RESULTS

Table 1 shows column percentages of SSC by key characteristics of the mother and newborn in Nigeria. Only about 10% of mothers (1217/12 265) reported SSC, and there was little difference between mothers whose newborns received SSC and mothers whose newborns did not receive SSC. However, there was one significant difference. Newborns who were perceived to be large were significantly more likely to experience SSC than smaller newborns. About 55% of the newborns who received SSC were perceived to be large, compared to 29% and 16% for those perceived to be average and small, respectively.

Table 1.  Skin-to-skin contact by key characteristics in Nigeria: Last non–facility birth in past five years (survey–weighted column percentages and counts)
Skin–to–skin contact
Yes No Total P
10% (n = 1217) 90% (n = 11 048) 100.0% (N = 12 265)
Mother’s age: % n % n % n
  15–19 7.9 96 7.7 850 7.7 946
  20–24 20.3 248 20.9 2305 20.8 2551
  25–34 45.2 551 44.9 4964 45.0 5515
  35–49 26.6 323 26.5 2929 26.5 3249
Parity:
  1 13.8 168 14.6 1616 14.6 1784
  2–3 26.4 321 29.2 3223 28.9 3545
  4+ 59.8 728 56.2 6204 56.5 6932
Mother’s education:
  None 70.3 856 68.2 7538 68.5 8394
  Primary 17.8 217 17.0 1877 17.1 2093
  Secondary+ 11.8 144 14.8 1633 14.5 1774
Zone:
  North Central 16.3 198 11.1 1227 11.6 1425
  North East 33.8 412 20.4 2253 21.7 2665
  North West 42.9 523 52.6 5809 51.6 6332
  South East 1.2 14 2.7 297 2.5 312
  South South 4.1 50 7.3 806 7.0 856
  South West 1.7 21 5.9 651 5.5 672
Residence:
  Urban 18.7 228 20.4 2263 20.3 2486
  Rural 81.3 990 79.6 8785 79.7 9775
Wealth:
  Poorest 38.6 470 34.8 3843 35.2 4313
  Second 27.2 331 29.8 3294 29.6 3624
  Middle 18.2 221 18.6 2057 18.6 2279
  Fourth 11.5 140 11.8 1300 11.7 1438
  Richest 4.6 56 5.0 553 4.9 606
Estimated size at birth:
  Small 16.0 193 18.0 1973 17.8 2167
  Average 29.4 355 42.2 4630 40.9 4985
  Large 54.7 662 39.9 4378 41.3 5040  < 0.001
Attendant at delivery:
  Doctor/midwife/Nurse 5.5 67 3.8 417 4.0 484
  Unskilled provider/friend/family member/other 94.5 1141 96.2 10 588 96.0 11 729


Table 2 shows column percentages of SSC by key characteristics for the Bangladesh sample. Overall, about 26% of mothers (1210/4586) reported SSC with their newborn, and once again there was little difference between mothers whose newborns received SSC vs those that did not. The only significant finding was that newborns of parity 2–3 were significantly more likely to have experienced SSC with their mothers compared to newborns of parity one and higher parity. Of the newborns receiving SSC 50% were of parity 2–3 compared to 39% for newborns of parity one and 11% for newborns of parity 4 and higher. This finding, however was only significant at P < 0.10.

Table 2.  Skin–to–skin contact by key characteristics in Bangladesh: last birth in past three years (survey–weighted column percentages and counts)
Skin–to–skin contact
Yes No Total P
26% (n = 1210) 84% (n = 3376) 100.0% (N = 4586)
Mother’s age: % n % n % n
  15–19 19.7 238 21.3 718 20.9 957
  20–24 33.2 401 33.7 1138 33.6 1540
  25–34 41.9 506 38.7 1305 39.5 1812
  35–49 5.2 63 6.3 214 6.0 277
Parity:
  1 38.5 465 40.1 1352 39.6 1818
  2–3 50.3 609 45.1 1524 46.5 2132
  4+ 11.2 136 14.8 500 13.9 636  < 0.1
Mother’s education:
  None 11.8 143 15.1 508 14.2 651
  Primary 28.6 346 27.7 936 28.0 1283
  Secondary+ 59.6 721 57.2 1931 57.8 2652
Division:
  Barisal 6.1 74 5.7 192 5.8 267
  Chittagong 17.5 212 23.4 791 21.9 1003
  Dhaka 40.2 486 33.6 1135 35.4 1621
  Khulna 8.6 104 7.7 259 7.9 363
  Rajshahi 9.0 109 10.5 353 10.1 462
  Rangpur 9.5 114 9.8 332 9.7 446
  Sylhet 9.1 110 9.3 314 9.2 424
Residence:
  Urban 26.2 317 26.1 881 26.1 1198
  Rural 73.8 893 73.9 2495 73.9 3388
Wealth:
  Poorest 22.1 268 21.6 730 21.8 997
  Second 17.6 213 19.5 659 19.0 872
  Middle 19.7 238 18.7 632 19.0 870
  Fourth 22.0 266 20.0 675 20.5 942
  Richest 18.6 225 20.2 680 19.7 905
Estimated size at birth:
  Small 22.7 275 18.9 637 19.9 912
  Average 65.5 793 67.9 2291 67.3 3084
  Large 11.7 142 13.2 447 12.8 589
Delivery location:
  Home 58.0 701 62.8 2121 61.6 2822
  Health facility 38.6 466 34.8 1175 35.8 1641
  Public 15.5* 187 12.1 409 13.0 596
  Private 23.1* 279 22.7 767 22.8 1046
  Other 3.4 41 2.4 80 2.6 121
Attendant at delivery:
   Doctor/midwife/nurse 33.3 402 31.7 1064 32.1 1465
   Unskilled provider/friend/family member/
   other 66.7 803 68.3 2293 67.9 3096
Caesarean delivery:
  Yes 23.3 281 24.2 817 24.0 1099
  No 76.7 928 75.8 2558 76.0 3486

*Percentages of total deliveries.



Table 3 shows results from regression analyses of early breastfeeding on SSC, controlling for key characteristics of mothers and newborns. In both Nigeria and Bangladesh, SSC was associated with significantly increased odds of early breastfeeding, controlling for all other variables in the models. The odds of early breastfeeding was 42% for newborns receiving SSC in Nigeria and 27% for newborns receiving SSC in Bangladesh (odds ratio (OR) = 1.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15–1.76; OR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.04–1.55, respectively). Also, in Nigeria several maternal demographic variables were associated with increased odds of early breastfeeding. Newborns of parity 2 or 3 had a 23% increased odds of SSC than newborns of parity 1 (OR = 1.23, 95% CI 1.02–1.50). Compared to North Central, the referent region, the odds of early breastfeeding were significantly lower for newborns in North West, South East and Southwest. Newborns from wealthier households were significantly more likely to experience early breastfeeding than newborns from the very poorest households. The odds ranged from 30% to 59% depending on the specific wealth quintile.

Table 3.  Survey–weighted logistic regression analysis of early breastfeeding on skin–to–skin contact for the most recent birth, controlling for maternal and infant characteristics
Characteristic Nigeria (N = 11 419) Bangladesh (N = 4262)
Predictor variable OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Skin–to–skin contact 1.42‡ 1.15, 1.76 1.27* 1.04, 1.55
Delivery characteristics
Facility delivery:
No NA 1.00
Yes 0.70* 0.53, 0.92
Caesarean delivery:
No NA 1.00
Yes 0.33‡ 0.26, 0.43
Estimated size at birth:
Small 1.00 1.00
Average 1.10 0.94, 1.28 1.06 0.87, 1.31
Large 1.08 0.92, 1.26 0.96 0.68, 1.35
Attendant at delivery:
Unskilled
provider/friend/family
member/other 1.00 1.00
Doctor/midwife/nurse 1.03 (0.78, 1.37) 1.43 0.98, 2.09
Maternal demographic characteristics
Age:
15–19 1.00 1.00
20–24 1.07 0.86, 1.32 1.14 0.92, 1.42
25–34 1.15 0.92, 1.45 0.94 0.73, 1.20
35–49 1.23 1.02, 1.50 0.74 0.44, 1.25
Parity:
1 1.00 1.00
2–3 1.23* 1.02, 1.50 1.08 0.90, 1.31
4+ 1.18 0.95, 1.47 1.04 0.75, 1.43
Zone/Division:
Nigeria Bangladesh
North Central Barisal 1.00 1.00
North East Chittago 1.21 0.95, 1.55 0.83 0.60, 1.14
North West Dhaka 0.58‡ 0.46, 0.73 1.15 0.80, 1.64
South East Khulna 0.45† 0.28, 0.71 0.81 0.57, 1.14
South South Rajshahi 0.92 0.71, 1.18 1.22 0.88, 1.70
South West Rangpur 0.40‡ 0.28, 0.57 1.50* 1.03, 2.17
Sylhet 1.42* (1.02, 1.96)
Residence:
Rural 1.00 1.00
Urban 1.91‡ 1.49, 2.43 0.85 0.67, 1.08
Education:
None 1.00 1.00
Primary 1.07 0.91, 1.26 0.90 0.66, 1.22
Secondary+ 1.05 0.86, 1.28 0.86 0.65, 1.13
Wealth:
Poorest 1.00 1.00
Second 1.30‡ 1.08, 1.58 0.85 0.66, 1.10
Middle 1.37* 1.08, 1.75 0.93 0.70, 1.26
Fourth 1.59† 1.20, 2.11 1.13 0.84, 1.52
Richest 1.47* 1.00, 2.16 1.06 0.75, 1.51
Marital status:
Not married 1.00 1.00
Married 0.96 0.76, 1.21 1.00 0.41, 2.44

*P < 0.05.

P < 0.01.

P < 0.001.



The results for Bangladesh indicated that Cesarean delivery was associated with a 67% lower odds of early breastfeeding (OR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.26–0.43), and facility delivery was associated with a 30% lower odds of early breastfeeding (OR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.53–0.92). There were also two significant effects for division. Compared to the referent division, Barisal, residence in Rangpur was associated with a 50% higher odds of early breastfeeding (OR = 1.50, 95% CI 1.03–2.17) and in Sylhet with a 42% higher odds of early breastfeeding (OR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.02–1.96).

DISCUSSION

SSC is a natural intervention with numerous benefits, yet it is under–practiced as many mothers and newborns are separated after birth often due to routine procedures [5,1315]. SSC has been studied as part of trials, but this is the first analysis to use population–level data to look at coverage and factors related to coverage. Associations between SSC with the early initiation of breastfeeding were also studied given the numerous benefits of early breastfeeding, including reduced infant mortality [20,21]. SSC is also considered step 4 of 10 Steps to Successfully Breastfeeding promoted by the Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative [22].

In our study, we found low coverage of SSC in both Nigeria (10%) and Bangladesh (26%) and few differences between newborns receiving SSC and those not receiving SSC. Though an uncommon intervention, in the regression models SSC was significantly associated with early initiation of breastfeeding in both Nigeria and Bangladesh. Thus, our results support findings from trials indicating that SSC is associated with improved breastfeeding outcomes [5] and specifically with early breastfeeding.

Another key finding from the first regression models was that in Bangladesh newborns born in a health facility were less likely to experience early breastfeeding than those born in non–facility environments. There are several plausible explanations for this finding. Some of the mothers and babies may have gone to the facility because of a complication, and this complication may have required separation beyond one hour. A second possible explanation involves health facility procedures, which often require the immediate separation of mother and newborns, which in turn prevents both SSC and early breastfeeding. Many maternal and newborn assessments can actually be done during SSC or can be delayed until after the critical SSC period, so long as the mother and newborn do not have any complications [16,2325]. Findings from Bangladesh revealed that newborns of mothers who had a Cesarean section were significantly less likely to be breastfed early. Other studies have found the same results [26,27], but there is an increasing recognition that health facilities must implement protocols that allow mothers who have a Cesarean section to breastfeed early. The Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative recommends that SSC can actually begin in the operating theater (after a Cesarean section) when the mother is alert [22,25].

Skilled delivery in a health facility is promoted as an essential strategy to improve both maternal and newborn health [28,29]. The ideal situation would be for women to deliver in a health facility with a SBA who can oversee SSC, as mother and baby should be monitored in case any complication or safety concerns should arise [30].

Other significant findings from the regression analyses are also worthy to note. In both countries there were some differences by zone or division. In Nigeria the northern zones are generally poorer than the southern zones. However early breastfeeding was less common in the southern zones than in the North Central zone. A study by Berde and Yalcin also found variation in the early initiation of breastfeeding by zone [31]. Our results from Bangladesh indicated that early breastfeeding was more common in Rangpur and Sylhet, the poorest divisions, compared to Barisal. A systematic review of early breastfeeding in South Asia also found geographic differences in the early initiation of breastfeeding within countries and also highlighted the influence of traditional practices, which may vary within countries [32]. Another systematic review highlighted the importance of the knowledge and beliefs of family members, particularly for women who deliver at home [33]. A study from Nepal attributed variations in early breastfeeding to many factors including socioeconomic factors, geographic terrain and the availability of formula [34]. Our findings from Nigeria suggested that wealthier and urban women as well as those of parity 2 or 3, had increased odds of having their newborns initiate breastfeeding early. These women may have greater knowledge than their counterparts and some previous experience with breastfeeding. Perceived size at birth was not significant in our regression analyses, but other studies have found that low birthweight and premature newborns are less likely to be breastfed early than normal weight and term newborns [32,33]. Taken together, these comprehensive findings suggest that there is a need to ensure equitable diffusion of knowledge on the importance of early breastfeeding and SSC to all delivery attendants and to all women and families regardless of wealth, parity or geographic residence.

There are several limitations to this analysis. The questions on SSC were not the same for the two countries, and SSC was only asked to women who had a non–facility delivery in Nigeria. More broadly additional work may be needed to validate measures of SSC. A validation study by Blanc et al. 2016 [35] in Kenya found that questions on SSC (newborn placed against mother’s chest after delivery and newborn was naked on skin, not wrapped in towel) did not perform well in terms of individual–level reporting accuracy and population–level accuracy. In this study women’s reports before discharge were compared to direct observation in two hospitals. However, Stanton et al. 2013 [36] found that a question on SSC met the criteria for quality reporting in study in Mozambique, which compared women’s reporting in household surveys (8 to 10 months after delivery) to direct observations. Further work may be needed on exact wording for questions on SSC and for appropriate probes. Another limitation is that the DHS data did not yield complete information on actual birthweight, which is often unknown for newborns who are born at home and not weighed. Also lacking were information on maternal and newborn complications as well as quality of care at the facilities and characteristics of providers. Recall bias could also be an issue in that mothers were asked to recall an event that occurred in a one–hour period. Some of the mothers had births several years (three to five) before the survey.

In terms of program recommendations, training of SBAs on proper thermal care for newborns including SSC is a key step in improving newborn health. The WHO’s Essential Newborn Training Guide includes modules on thermal care including SSC [6]. Manasyan et al. 2011 found this training to be cost–effective for midwives at first level health facilities in Zambia [37]. Trainings will need to be done on a large scale to ensure that all healthy newborns, regardless of delivery type (vaginal vs Cesarean), size or socioeconomic status, receive SSC. At the same time community engagement is needed to enable more mothers and families to learn about the protective effects of SSC. More research is needed on exact timing of initiation of SSC, frequency and duration as well as measures to ensure SSC is as safe as possible [5]. SSC is an intervention with the potential to save newborn lives.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Carolina Population Center and its NIH Center grant (P2C HD050924) for general support.

Disclaimers: The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the United States Government or those of UNICEF.

Notes

[1] Funding: This study was carried out with support provided by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through MEASURE Evaluation (cooperative agreement AID–OAA–L–14–00004). The views expressed are not necessarily those of USAID or the United States government.

[2] Authorship declaration: KS, SK, LCV and AA led the development of ideas for the paper. KS led the writing and analysis plan, and PB led the data management. SK, LCV, AA and AM provided substantial inputs and ideas into all drafts of the paper.

[3] Competing interests: The authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare no competing interests.

REFERENCES

[1] UNICEF. Levels and trends in under-five mortality. Estimates developed by the UN Interagency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. New York: UNICEF; 2015.

[2] WHO. MCEE-WHO methods and data sources for child causes of death 2000-2015. Global Health Estimates Technical Paper WHO/HIS/IER/GHE/2016.1 Geneva: WHO; 2016.

[3] WHO. Every newborn: An action plan to end preventable deaths. Geneva:WHO; 2014.

[4] WHO. Thermal Protection of the Newborn: A practical guide. The Safe Motherhood Initiative. Geneva: WHO; 1997.

[5] ER Moore, G Anderson, N Bergman, and T Doswell. Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 5: CD003519 [22592691]

[6] WHO. Essential newborn care training module. 2010. Available: http://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/newborncare_course/en/. Accessed: 6 February 2017.

[7] AM Widström, G Lilja, P Aaltomaa-Michalias, A Dahllöf, M Lintula, and E Nissen. Newborn behaviour to locate the breast when skin-to-skin: a possible method for enabling early self-regulation. Acta Paediatr. 2011; 100: 79 -85. DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2010.01983.x. [20712833]

[8] F Nahidi, SS Tavafian, M Heidarzadeh, E Hajizadeh, and A Montazeri. The Mother-Newborn Skin-to-Skin Contact Questionnaire (MSSCQ): development and psychometric evaluation among Iranian midwives. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14: 85 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-85. [24564830]

[9] E Saastad, T Ahlborg, and JF Froen. Low maternal awareness of fetal movement is associated with small for gestational age infants. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2008; 53: 345 -52. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2008.03.001. [18586188]

[10] K Mikiel-Kostyra, J Mazur, and I Bołtruszko. Effect of early skin-to-skin contact after delivery on duration of breastfeeding: a prospective cohort study. Acta Paediatr. 2002; 91: 1301 -6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2002.tb02824.x. [12578285]

[11] A Thukral, MJ Sankar, R Agarwal, N Gupta, AK Deorari, and VK Paul. Early skin-to-skin contact and breastfeeding behaviors in term neonates: A randomized controlled trial. Neonatology. 2012; 102: 114 -9. DOI: 10.1159/000337839. [22699241]

[12] MH Bornstein. Sensitive periods in development: Structural characteristics and casual intrepretations. Psychol Bull. 1989; 105: 179 -97. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.105.2.179. [2648441]

[13] GC Anderson. The mother and newborn: Mutual caregivers. JOGN Nurs. 1977; 6: 50 -7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1977.tb02181.x. [242611]

[14] M Odent. New reasons and new ways to study birth physiology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001; 75: Suppl 1 S39 -45. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7292(01)00512-4. [11742641]

[15] J Winberg. Examining breast-feeding performance: forgotten influencing factors. Acta Paediatr. 1995; 84: 465 -7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1995.tb13675.x. [7633136]

[16] . Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics. 2012; 129: e827 -41. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2011-3552. [22371471]

[17] National Population Commission (NPC) [Nigeria] and ICF International. Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2013. Abuja, Nigeria, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: NPC and ICF International; 2014.

[18] National Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT), Mitra and Associates, and ICF International. Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2014. Dhaka, Bangladesh, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: NIPORT, Mitra and Associates, and ICF International; 2016.

[19] Begum K, Dewey K. Impact of early initiation on breastfeeding on neonatal deaths. A&T Technical Brief. Issue 1. FHI 360. Washington, DC: FHI 360, Alive and Thrive; 2010.

[20] KM Edmond, C Zandoh, MA Quigley, S Amenga-Etego, S Owusu-Agyei, and BR Kirkwood. Delayed breastfeeding initiation increases risk of neonatal mortality. Pediatrics. 2006; 117: e380 -6. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-1496. [16510618]

[21] LC Mullany, J Katz, YM Li, SK Khatry, SC LeClerq, and GL Darmstadt. Breast-feeding patterns, time to initiation, and mortality risk among newborns in southern Nepal. J Nutr. 2008; 138: 599 -603. [18287373]

[22] World Health Organization, United Nations Children’s Fund. Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative: Revised, updated, and expanded for integrated care. Geneva: WHO; 2009.

[23] . Special report from ACOG. Breastfeeding: Maternal and infant aspects. ACOG Clin Rev. 2013; 12: Suppl. 1 1S -16S.

[24] HL Sobel, MAA Silvestre, JBV Mantaring, YE Oliveros, and US Nyunt. Immediate newborn care practices delay thermoregulation and breastfeeding initiation. Acta Paediatr. 2011; 100: 1127 -33. DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02215.x. [21375583]

[25] JT Crenshaw. Healthy Birth Practice #6: Keep mother and baby together—it’s best for mother, baby and breastfeeding. J Perinat Educ. 2014; 23: 211 -7. DOI: 10.1891/1058-1243.23.4.211. [25411542]

[26] AJ Hobbs, CA Mannion, SW McDonald, M Brockway, and SC Tough. The impact of caesarean section on breastfeeding initiation, duration and difficulties in the first four months postpartum. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016; 16: 90 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-016-0876-1. [27118118]

[27] HJ Rowe-Murray and JRW Fisher. Baby friendly hospital practices: cesarean section is a persistent barrier to early initiation of breastfeeding. Birth. 2002; 29: 124 -31. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-536X.2002.00172.x. [12000413]

[28] KJ Kerber, J de Graft, Z Bhutta, P Okong, A Starrs, and J Lawn. Continuum of care for maternal, newborn,and Child health: from slogan to service delivery. Lancet. 2007; 370: 1358 -69. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61578-5. [17933651]

[29] OMR Campbell, C Calvert, A Testa, M Strehlow, L Benova, and E Keyes. The scale, scope, coverage, and capability of childbirth care. Lancet. 2016; 388: 2193 -208. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31528-8. [27642023]

[30] L Feldman-Winter and JP Goldsmith. Safe sleep and skin-to-skin care in the neonatal period for healthy term newborns. Pediatrics. 2016; 138: e20161889 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2016-1889. [27550975]

[31] AS Berde and SS Yalcin. Determinants of early initiation of breastfeeding in Nigeria: A population-based study using the 2013 demographic and health survey data. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016; 16: 32 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-016-0818-y. [26852324]

[32] IK Sharma and A Bryne. Early initiation of breastfeeding: A systematic literature review of factors and barriers in South Asia. Int J Breastfeed.. 2016; 11: 17 DOI: 10.1186/s13006-016-0076-7. [27330542]

[33] TMB Esteves, RP Daumas, MI Couto de Oliveira, CA de Ferreira de Andrade, and IC Leite. Factors associated to breastfeeding in the first hour of life: Systematic review. Rev Saude Publica. 2014; 48: 697 -708. DOI: 10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005278. [25210829]

[34] M Adhikari, V Khanal, R Karkee, and T Gavidia. Factors associated with EIBF among Nepalese mothers: further analysis of Nepal Demographic and Health Survey, 2011. Int Breastfeed J. 2014; 9: 21 DOI: 10.1186/s13006-014-0021-6. [25493094]

[35] AK Blanc, C Warren, KJ McCarthy, J Kimani, and C Ndwiga. RamaRao S. Assessing the validity of indicators of the quality of maternal and newborn health care in Kenya. J Glob Health. 2016; 6: 010405 DOI: 10.7189/jogh.06.010405. [27231541]

[36] CK Stanton, B Rawlins, M Drake, M dos Anjos, D Cantor, and L Chongo. Measuring coverage in MNCH: Testing the validity of women’s self-report of key maternal and newborn health interventions during the peripartum period in Mozambique. PLoS One. 2013; 8: e60694 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060694. [23667427]

[37] A Manasyan, E Chomba, EM McClure, LL Wright, S Krzywanski, and WA Carlo. Cost-effectiveness of essential newborn care training in urban first-level facilities. Pediatrics. 2011; 127: e1176 -81. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-2158. [21502223]



Journal of Global Health (ISSN 2047-2986), Edinburgh University Global Health Society
Designed by