Impact factor (WEB OF SCIENCE - Clarivate)

2 year: 7.664 | 5 year: 7.127

ArticlesOngoing Research Themes

Impact of new health care reform on enabling environment for children’s health in China: An interrupted time-series study

Huihui Huangfu1,2, Zhifan Zhang1,2, Qinwen Yu1,2, Qingyu Zhou1,2, Peiwu Shi2,3, Qunhong Shen2,4, Zhaoyang Zhang2,5, Zheng Chen2,6, Chuan Pu2,7, Lingzhong Xu2,8, Zhi Hu2,9, Anning Ma2,10, Zhaohui Gong2,11, Tianqiang Xu2,12, Panshi Wang2,13, Hua Wang2,14, Chao Hao2,15, Chengyue Li1,2, Mo Hao1,2

1 Research Institute of Health Development Strategies, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
2 Collaborative Innovation Center of Social Risks Governance in Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
3 Zhejiang Academy of Medical Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
4 School of Public Policy and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
5 Project Supervision Center of National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing, China
6 Department of Grassroots Public Health Management Group, Public Health Management Branch of Chinese Preventive Medicine Association, Shanghai, China
7 School of Public Health and Management, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
8 School of Public Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
9 School of Health Service Management, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China
10 School of Management, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong, China
11 Committee on Medicine and Health of Central Committee of China ZHI GONG PARTY, Beijing, China
12 Institute of Inspection and Supervision, Shanghai Municipal Health Commission, Shanghai, China
13 Shanghai Municipal Health Commission, Shanghai, China
14 Jiangsu Preventive Medicine Association, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
15 Changzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China




Creating an enabling environment (EE) can help foster the development and health of children. The Chinese government implemented a new health care reform (NHR) in 2009 in a move to promote an EE for health. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of the NHR on EE for children’s health.


An interrupted time-series analysis was used to evaluate the changes in the EE before and after 2009 in China. This study analysed the EE through five quantitative indicators, including policy element coverage rate (PECR), service meeting with children’s needs rate (SMCNR), multisector participation rate (MPR), and accountability mechanism clarity rate (AMCR), based on the content analysis of available public policy documents (updated as of 2019) from 31 provinces in mainland China, and the number of health care personnel of maternity and child care centres per 10 000 population (HP per 10 000 population), based on the 2002–2019 China Health Statistical Yearbook and China Statistical Yearbook.


The average values of PECR, SMCNR, and MPR increased rapidly to 90.96%, 82.46%, and 81.31%, respectively, in 2019, representing a higher value compared to the AMCR (7.38%). The NHR promoted the EE, in which HP per 10 000 population showed the fastest increase (β1 = 0.03, P < 0.01; β3 = 0.10, P < 0.01), followed by SMCNR (β1 = 0.94, P < 0.01; β3 = 1.83, P < 0.01), AMCR (β1 = 0.13, P < 0.01; β3 = 0.24, P = 0.14), MPR (β1 = 1.35, P < 0.01; β3 = 2.47, P < 0.01) and PECR (β1 = 1.43, P < 0.01; β3 = 1.47, P < 0.01).


The NHR has a positive impact on the EE, especially on the human resources and service provision for children. Efforts should be intensified to improve the clarity of the accountability mechanism of the health-related sectors.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Children’s health and future are intimately linked to the health of our planet [1]. In 2020, nearly 40% of children in China faced risks such as early stunting [2]. If these risks are not effectively controlled, by 2040, nearly half of China’s workforce will be compromised. This not only hinders the country’s development, but also widens inequality, exposing China to the risk of instability [3].

Creating an enabling environment (EE) can promote the development and health of children [4]. In 2010, the United Nations launched the Every Woman Every Child movement to mobilise governments and sectors to jointly create an EE for children [5]. According to the Global Strategy for Women’s, Children’s and Adolescents’ Health (2016-2030), an EE within the health system and other sectors would strengthen the investments in children’s health, including health policies, resource allocation, health service provision, multisector collaboration, etc [6].

China has progressed in the direction. At present, China has developed a relatively complete policy and legal system in the field of women and children [7]. The new health care reform (NHR) was launched in 2009 by the Chinese government, and aimed to improve the network of public health services for maternal and children. Meanwhile, the reform also focused on promoting equitable access to essential health services, including health records, health education, health management, etc. For example, the government established a child health manual for infants under 3 years old, carried out neonatal visits and child health system management, and vaccinated school-aged children under a national immunisation programme [8,9]. By 2019, the under-five mortality rate in China dropped from 17.2‰ (in 2009) to 7.8‰ [10]. This indicated that after the NHR, the EE in China has realised the importance of children’s rights to health and well-being [10].

Research on the EE mainly focused on the current situation of health problems experienced by children at different stages of life, such as adolescent sexual and reproductive health [4], infant and young child nutrition [1113], breastfeeding [14,15], and childhood stunting [16]. Some studies have analysed the health-related changes in the EE before and after implementing the policies. Zhao et al. found that the essential public health service project had a positive impact on neonatal health services and in reducing neonatal mortality [17]. Sia et al. and Druetz et al. considered that the free health care policy characterised by free consultation, care, medication and laboratory and radiological examinations (including ultrasounds) implemented in 2016 in Burkina Faso had increased the usage of health services for children aged under 5 years [18,19]. The input of resources has increased, and the equity of resource allocation has also improved. For example, Yang et al. found that the number of health care personnel in township hospital centres in China increased after the NHR [20]. Meanwhile, Fu et al. and Zhao et al. reported that health resource allocation has improved [2123]. Health sectors began to show the trend of multisector collaborative governance after the reform [24]. To the best of our knowledge, many studies have focused on the impact of policy implementation on a single aspect of the EE, such as service provision and utilisation, resource allocation, and multisector collaboration. However, there is little comprehensively analysed evidence on how the NHR affected the EE. Thus, through this study, we attempted to fill this gap and assess the impact of NHR on children’s health from the perspective of EE.


Study design and setting

We used an interrupted time-series (ITS) analysis to evaluate the changes brought by the NHR on the EE in China. In 2009, the State Council released the Opinions on Deepening the Reform of the Medical and Health Care System, in which the government proposed to improve the network of public health service for maternal and children and focused on promoting equitable access to essential health services [8]. We considered 31 provinces in mainland China as the study setting and analysed the changes in the EE before (2002–2008) and after (2009–2019) the NHR was implemented. We assumed that any time-varying unmeasured confounder changed relatively slowly [25].


According to the Global Strategy for Women’s, Children’s and Adolescents’ Health (2016-2030), EE for children’s health includes policies for universal health coverage, mainstreaming emergency preparedness, human rights, equity and gender-based approaches in programming, sufficient and sustainable financing, human resources, health facility infrastructure, good-quality care provision, community engagement and accountability at all levels, and multisector promotion strategies, including finance and social protection, education, gender, protection registration, law and justice, water and sanitation, agriculture and nutrition, environment and energy, labour and trade, infrastructure, information and communication technologies, and transport [6]. Therefore, we designed five indicators to reflect the situation of the EE (Table 1). The larger the indicator value, the better is the EE for children’s health.

Table 1.  Definition of five indicators of enabling environment.

Policies for universal health coverage, mainstreaming emergency preparedness, and human rights, equity, and gender-based approaches in programming are the political guarantees for health [28]. This requires a good policy environment to provide guarantees regarding objectives, tasks and measures, organisation and resource allocation, department responsibilities and accountability, department assessment and incentive, etc [26]. Therefore, we used the policy element coverage rate (PECR) to reflect the three elements.

Sufficient and sustainable financing, human resources, and health facility infrastructure represent the resource guarantees for health [29]. Human resources are the primary and critical resources, while financing and health facility infrastructure must be manipulated and dominated by human resources [30]. Therefore, we used the number of health care personnel of maternity and child care centres per 10 000 population (HP per 10 000 population) to reflect the resource allocation.

Good-quality care provision is the service guarantee for health [28]. This requires health services delivery that meets the physical and psychological needs of children. Therefore, we used the service meeting with the children’s needs rate (SMCNR) to reflect the provision of good-quality care. According to the guidelines and agendas for children’s health issued by the World Health Organization (WHO), China, the United States, and the United Kingdom [6,3133], as well as expert consultation, at least eight types of services should be provided, including birth defect screening and management, exclusive breastfeeding guidance, specialised case management for high-risk children, nutrition guidance for infants, infant growth and development monitoring, early childhood development, child growth and development monitoring, and mental behavioural development evaluation and guidance (Table S1 in the Online Supplementary Document).

Community engagement and multisector promotion measures are the embodiment of multisector participation and coordination, and provide the structural foundation for promoting children’s health [34]. Therefore, we used the multisector participation rate (MPR) to reflect sector participation. There should be at least 15 stakeholders involved in children’s health according to WHO and China [3,6,3537], including the government, health commission, public health agencies, hospitals, primary health care institutions, policy security department, finance bureau, human resources and social security bureau, health care security administration, education commission, civil affairs bureau, agriculture and rural affairs bureau, construction department, and water resources department, among others.

Accountability at all levels is crucial to ensure that sectors meet their commitments and put them into practice [6]. This requires the sectors to have clear responsibility and accountability. Therefore, we used the accountability mechanism clarity rate (AMCR) to reflect accountability at all levels.

Data collection

We obtained the PECR, SMCNR, MPR, and AMCR data from the content analysis of policy documents collected from official websites of the legislature and legal databases of 31 provinces in mainland China (updated as of 2019). The types of policy documents included laws, regulations, strategies, norms, rules, plans, budgets, guidelines, and standards [38]. Policy documents which were duplicate, or without administrative validity or a specific publication date, were excluded [38]. Finally, a total of 1393 documents were collected in our study (Figure S1 in the Online Supplementary Document).

We extracted the information needed for the four indicators from policy documents and provided detailed information coding in Table S2 in the Online Supplementary Document. Taking MPR as an example, we determined whether 15 categories of departments were referred to in the documents. If it mentioned that health services were organised and implemented by the hospitals, they were considered as a stakeholder in children’s health. Thus, we coded the hospitals as 1. The number of departments mentioned divided by 15 (number of departments) constituted the MPR value. The test-retest reliability method with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to analyse the credibility of the data collection. After retesting by two experienced researchers, the ICC value was higher than 0.75, indicating a highly credible data collection.

We obtained the number of health care personnel of maternity and child care centres and the total population at the year-end data from the 2002–2019 China Health Statistical Yearbook and China Statistical Yearbook.

Statistical analysis

ITS can be considered a quasi-experimental research design with a high degree of internal validity to assess the longitudinal effects of interventions [39]. Thus, we used the ITS analysis to assess the level and trend changes in EE before and after the NHR, and performed the Cumby-Huizinga test for autocorrelation [40]. We regarded 2009 as the intervention time point. The specific formula applied was as follows: Yt = β0+ β1 × time + β2 × intervention + β3 × time_after_intervention + εit

Yt was the outcome variable measured at time point t. β0 represented the level of the outcome at the start time. β1 represented the trend of outcome preintervention. β2 represented a change in the level of outcome postintervention. β3 represented a change in the trend of outcome postintervention. εit was an estimate of random error at time t.

Data were analysed using Excel 2019 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) and Stata 14.0 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX, USA). Given the small sample size, the level of statistical significance was set at P < 0.1.


Description analysis of EE

Table 2 shows that the average values of PECR, HP per 10 000 population, SMCNR, MPR, and AMCR in 2002 were 42.55%, 1.22 person, 41.02%, 34.23%, and 1.19%, respectively. The average values of PECR, SMCNR, and MPR in 2019 were over 80%, 90.96%, 82.46%, and 81.31%, respectively, while the AMCR value was 7.38%. HP per 10 000 population in 2019 was 2.66 person. The EE for children’s health has improved since 2002, with the largest increment in AMCR (518.06%) and the smallest in SMCNR (101.05%).

Table 2.  Description statistics of enabling environment from 2002 to 2019

PECR – policy element coverage rate, HP – health care personnel, SMCNR – service meeting with children’s needs rate, MPR – multisector participation rate, AMCR – accountability mechanism clarity rate

Analysis of the impact of reform on EE

Table 3 and Figure 1 show the ITS analysis results of the impact of reform on the EE. The trend of all indicators slowly increased before the NHR in PECR (1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.14 to 1.72, P < 0.01), HP per 10 000 population (0.03, 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.04, P < 0.01), SMCNR (0.94, 95% CI = 0.61 to 1.27, P < 0.01), MPR (1.35, 95% CI = 1.15 to 1.56, P < 0.01), and AMCR (0.13, 95% CI = 0.09 to 0.16, P < 0.01). After the reform, there was an immediate increase in PECR (13.79, 95% CI = 7.72 to 19.85, P < 0.01), SMCNR (11.42, 95% CI = 3.18 to 19.66, P < 0.05), MPR (2.43, 95% CI = 0.17 to 4.68, P < 0.05), and AMCR (2.66, 95% CI = 0.44 to 4.89, P < 0.05). The trend of all the rates showed a rapid increase in PECR (1.47, 95% CI = 0.57 to 2.37, P < 0.01), HP per 10 000 population (0.10, 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.13, P < 0.01), SMCNR (1.83, 95% CI = 0.66 to 2.99, P < 0.01), and MPR (2.47, 95% CI = 1.95 to 2.98, P < 0.01). The two fastest increasing indicators were HP per 10 000 population (3.33, 0.10/0.03) and SMCNR (1.95, 1.83/0.94).

Table 3.  Estimated level and trend changes of enabling environment pre- and post-intervention

PECR – policy element coverage rate, HP – health care personnel, SMCNR – service meeting with children’s needs rate, MPR – multisector participation rate, AMCR – accounttability mechanism clarity rate

*P < 0.05-

P < 0.01.

Figure 1.  Level and trend changes of five indicators pre- and post-intervention. PECR – policy element coverage rate, HP – health care personnel, SMCNR – service meeting with children needs rate, MPR – multisector participation rate, AMCR – accountability mechanism clarity rate.


To our knowledge, this study is the first to use public policy documents, instead of the survey data, to quantitatively analyse the changes in the EE before and after the reform in China.

The NHR played a significant role in promoting an EE for the development and health of children, which is consistent with the research conclusions of Jin et al. [7], indicating that the government valued children’s health. First, the Chinese government incorporated children’s health into national economic and social development planning as a priority area [36,41,42]. The health sector also formulated a series of supporting regulations and policies [31,43], ensuring that children’s health services can be effectively provided [7]. Second, the government promoted children’s health into action [22]. China implemented major and essential public health service projects for children. Managing the supply, storage and distribution of vaccines, drugs, and nutritional packages has strengthened material guarantee for children’s health [7].

The results of the ITS showed that policy implementation has a positive impact on resource allocation and service provision. After the reform, resource allocation for children has improved significantly. This is consistent with the conclusions of Song et al [44]. The government has increased its efforts to improve the conditions of health personnel, including personnel training, personnel incentives, etc [8]. In 2011, the government put forward measures to increase the number of maternal and child care institutions, children’s hospitals and health personnel [41]. In 2016, the government adopted incentive measures for paediatric health personnel, including raising salaries and benefits, resulting in improved internal distribution mechanism by focusing on the quantity and quality of services and patient satisfaction. Meanwhile, the government also promoted the development of health personnel and prioritised the promotion and selection of highly qualified professionals [45]. As a result, the number of health care personnel in maternal and child care centres has continued to grow [46], and the overall quality and stability has improved [47,48].

This study also showed that the provision of good-quality care for children has increased significantly after the policy implementation, consistent with the research conclusions of Wang et al. [49]. Since 2009, China has gradually improved the network of public health service for maternal and children and have provided equitable access to essential health services [7]. For example, the government has implemented a nutrition programme for children living in poverty-stricken areas. They provided a pack of nutritional dietary supplements containing proteins, vitamins, and minerals on a daily basis for every child aged 6–24 months, and imparted education on child nutrition [42]. The neonatal disease screening program in poverty-stricken areas provided free screening and early diagnosis for 3.39 million neonatal children with phenylketonuria, congenital hypothyroidism, etc., from 2012 to 2015 [7,43]. These indicated that the NHR has placed greater emphasis on health services fundamental for children [50].

The results of the policy content analysis showed that the AMCR in China needed to be improved, which is consistent with the research conclusions of Geng et al. [51]. This may be due to several reasons. First, the responsibilities of the finance bureau and health care security administration were not clear [52]. For example, the Finance Bureau was responsible for using funds to support the infant care services industry. However, it did not specify the investment quota and timelines for the finance department, indicating the absence of implementation specifications. Second, the departmental accountability mechanism was not satisfactory. The government has evaluated the quality of services offered by the health sector, while the evaluation of other related sectors in most provinces is not yet clear [51]. For example, Education Commission, Human Resources and Social Security Bureau, Civil Affairs Bureau, etc., should jointly implement the nutrition programme [53]. However, the absence of the monitoring and accountability mechanisms for these sectors resulted in the awful implementation of the programme. Furthermore, the mismatch between the evaluation results and salaries has also failed to mobilise staff [54]. Therefore, the accountability mechanism should be established to restrain the behaviour of the departments involved. The results of the assessment should be engaged in staff performance appraisal, in order to mobilise the effective implementation of various measures for the goal of promoting children’s health.

This study has some policy implications. First, the establishment and improvement of EE for children cannot be separated from the government, which should play the leading role in policy, investment, etc. Second, resource allocation is prerequisite for progress. Resources are the basis to establish the EE for children. A sustainable resource supply will ensure the healthy development of children. Third, multisectoral cooperation is necessary to establish the EE. This requires not only the participation of health-related sectors but also the that of other sectors, such as the Finance Bureau, Education Commission, etc, to achieve the health for all children.

This study had several limitations. First, this study mainly focused on the national level. However, it did not analyse of the changes brought by the NHR to a specific region or province. Second, confounding by other policy interventions may bias ITS analyses [55]. For instance, in 2011, Chinese Children’s Development Outline (2011-2020) released by the State Council might promote the creation of an EE for children. The impact of this policy cannot be completely eliminated in the application of ITS. Therefore, this study may have overestimated the impact of NHR interventions. However, one of the strengths of ITS studies is that they can better avoid the effect by typical confounding factors, such as population status or economic development, etc., which remain fairly constant and are normally taken into account when modelling the underlying long-term trend [56]. Therefore, the typical confounding factors have little effect on our study. Third, this study focused on the impact of a macro-policy-enabling environment. In future studies, more attention could be paid to changes in the EE from the community or individual level.


Our study quantitatively analysed the impact of the NHR policy on EE for children’s health using an ITS. The findings showed that the reform had a positive impact on the EE. However, the accountability mechanism of departments needs to be improved. In the future, the government should continuously play a leading role in coordinating and clarifying multisector responsibilities, strengthening departmental accountability mechanisms, and providing better services and environment to meet the goal of improving children’s health.

Additional material

Online Supplementary Document


We are very grateful for the guidance of teachers and the support and help of team members. We also thank Tsinghua University, Shandong University, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Anhui Medical University, Nanjing Medical University, Harbin Medical University, Chongqing Medical University, Xinjiang Medical University, Weifang Medical University, Jining Medical University for their support of data collection.

[1] Funding: This study was supported by Tsien Hsue-shen Urbanology Award of Hangzhou International Urbanology Research Center & Zhejiang Urban Governance Studies Center (No. 21QXS004), Three-Year Action Plan of Shanghai Municipality Strengthens Public Health System Construction (No. GWIV-32 and No. GWV-12), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 72074048 and No. 71774031), and the Shanghai Foundation for Talents Development (No. 2020128). The funding bodies played no role in study design, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, or in writing the manuscript for publication.

[2] Authorship contributions: HH participated in research design, data collection and analysis, and manuscript writing. CL and MH participated in research design, data acquisition, manuscript revision, funding acquisition, and supervision. ZZ, QY, and QZ participated in data analysis and manuscript revision. PS, QS, ZZ, ZC, CP, LX, ZH, AM, ZG, TX, PW, HW, and CH contributed to manuscript revision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

[3] Competing interests: The authors completed the ICMJE Unified Competing Interest Form (available upon request from the corresponding author), and declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] H Clark, AM Coll-Seck, A Banerjee, S Peterson, SL Dalglish, and S Ameratunga. A future for the world’s children? A WHO-UNICEF-Lancet Commission. Lancet. 2020;395:605-58. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32540-1. [PMID:32085821]

[2] C Lu, MM Black, and LM Richter. Risk of poor development in young children in low-income and middle-income countries: an estimation and analysis at the global, regional, and country level. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4:e916-22. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30266-2. [PMID:27717632]

[3] Sany Foundation. Research report on early childhood development in China 2019, 2020. Available: Accessed: 25 July 2021.

[4] J Svanemyr, A Amin, OJ Robles, and ME Greene. Creating an enabling environment for adolescent sexual and reproductive health: A framework and promising approaches. J Adolesc Health. 2015;56:S7-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.09.011. [PMID:25528980]

[5] Every Woman Every Child. Every woman every child’s second decade, 2021. Available: Accessed: 27 September 2021.

[6] Every Woman Every Child. Global strategy for women’s, children’s and adolescents’ health (2016–2030). New York: Every Woman Every Child, 2015. Available: Accessed: 24 July 2021.

[7] Jin X, Luo R, Cao B, Robert S, Guo SF. Strategies for the survival and development among 0-6 years children in China: from evidence to action. Beijing: Peking University Medical Press; 2018.

[8] State Council of the People’s Republic of China. Opinions on Deepening Reform of the Medical and Healthcare System, 2009. Available: Accessed: 24 July 2021.

[9] State Council of the People’s Republic of China. Plan for reforming key areas of the medical and healthcare system (2009-2011), 2009. Available: Accessed: 21 July 2021.

[10] National Bureau of Statistics. Chinese children’s development outline (2011–2020) statistical monitoring report, 2020. Available: Accessed: 25 July 2021.

[11] LM Du Plessis, MH McLachlan, and SE Drimie. What does an enabling environment for infant and young child nutrition look like at implementation level? Perspectives from a multi-stakeholder process in the Breede Valley Sub-District, Western Cape, South Africa. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:240 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5165-7. [PMID:29433498]

[12] H Schneider, M van der Merwe, B Marutla, J Cupido, and S Kauchali. The whole is more than the sum of the parts: establishing an enabling health system environment for reducing acute child malnutrition in a rural South African district. Health Policy Plan. 2019;34:430-9. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czz060. [PMID:31280321]

[13] C Schauer, N Sunley, C Hubbell Melgarejo, C Nyhus Dhillon, C Roca, and G Tapia. Experiences and lessons learned for planning and supply of micronutrient powders interventions. Matern Child Nutr. 2017;13:e12494. DOI: 10.1111/mcn.12494. [PMID:28960875]

[14] I Ferré-Eguiluz, G Buccini, A Hromi-Fiedler, N Rovelo, T González de Cosío, and JR Pérez-Escamilla-Costas. Content analysis of media coverage of breastfeeding in Mexico. Matern Child Nutr. 2020;16:e12905. [PMID:31840404]

[15] R Pérez-Escamilla, AJ Hromi-Fiedler, MB Gubert, K Doucet, S Meyers, and G Dos Santos Buccini. Becoming breastfeeding friendly index: development and application for scaling-up breastfeeding programmes globally. Matern Child Nutr. 2018;14:e12596. DOI: 10.1111/mcn.12596. [PMID:29468832]

[16] M Shekar, J Kakietek, MR D’Alimonte, HE Rogers, JD Eberwein, and JK Akuoku. Reaching the global target to reduce stunting: An investment framework. Health Policy Plan. 2017;32:657-68. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czw184. [PMID:28453717]

[17] P Zhao, XY Han, LL You, Y Zhao, L Yang, and YL Liu. Effect of basic public health service project on neonatal health services and neonatal mortality in China: a longitudinal time-series study. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e034427. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034427. [PMID:32690734]

[18] D Sia, BDG Dondbzanga, M Carabali, E Bonnet, PR Enok Bonong, and V Ridde. Effect of a free healthcare policy on health services utilisation for non-malarial febrile illness by children under five years in Burkina Faso: an interrupted time series analysis. Trop Med Int Health. 2020;25:1226-34. DOI: 10.1111/tmi.13468. [PMID:32686252]

[19] T Druetz, A Bicaba, T Some, S Kouanda, A Ly, and S Haddad. Effect of interrupting free healthcare for children: drawing lessons at the critical moment of national scale-up in Burkina Faso. Soc Sci Med. 2017;185:46-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.05.040. [PMID:28554158]

[20] J Yang, ZF Lv, XY Wang, H Huang, L Li, and Y Wang. Comparative study on the construction of rural health care personnel in township hospital centres in China before and after the new medical system reform policy. Chin Gen Pract. 2014;17:1875-9.

[21] WQ Fu, GX Liu, QH Wu, and M Hao. Analysis on health financial resource allocation in primary medical institutions of China since the implementation of new medical reform. Clin Health Econ. 2015;34:51-2.

[22] SL Fu. Thoughts on the new medical reform and the development of maternal and child health. Chin J Women Child Health. 2012;3:305-7.

[23] CY Zhao and SZ Zhu. Analysis of the spatial allocation of health resources in Jiangsu Province after new medical reform based on topsis and arcgis. China Pharm. 2020;29:63-7.

[24] LN Zhang. Policy changes in ten years’ new health care reform-analysis based on national medical policy reform text from 2009-2019. Med Jurisprud. 2021;13:110-4.

[25] A Linden. Conducting interrupted time-series analysis for single- and multiple-group comparisons. Stata J. 2015;15:480-500. DOI: 10.1177/1536867X1501500208

[26] L Li, CY Li, QY Zhou, X Wang, X Gao, and Z Tian. A preliminary quantitative research on the comprehensiveness of maternal health management mechanism in Beijing and Shanghai. Chin Health Serv Manag. 2015;36:387-9.

[27] HH Huangfu, QW Yu, PW Shi, QH Shen, ZY Zhang, and Z Chen. The impacts of regional regulatory policies on the prevention and control of chronic diseases in China: a mediation analysis. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9:1058 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9081058. [PMID:34442195]

[28] World Health Organization. Monitoring the building blocks of health systems: a handbook of indicators and their measurement strategies, 2010. Available: Accessed: 22 March 2021.

[29] Meng QY. Health economics. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House; 2013.

[30] Mao JF. Health human resource management. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House; 2013.

[31] Health Commission. National standards for child health care (trial), 2009. Available: Accessed: 6 October 2021.

[32] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Maternal or infant illnesses or conditions, 2020. Available: Accessed: 24 July 2021.

[33] National Audit Office. Children in care, 2014. Available: Accessed: 24 July 2021.

[34] Hao M. Pursuing excellence—building an appropriate public health system. Beijing: CPC Central Party School Press; 2021.

[35] S Kuruvilla, F Bustreo, T Kuo, CK Mishra, K Taylor, and H Fogstad. The global strategy for women’s, children’s and adolesents’ health (2016-2030): a roadmap based on evidence and country experience. Bull World Health Organ. 2016;94:398-400. DOI: 10.2471/BLT.16.170431. [PMID:27147772]

[36] State Council of the People’s Republic of China. Guidance on promoting the development of care services for infants and young children under 3, 2019. Available: Accessed: 26 July 2021.

[37] State Council of the People’s Republic of China. 13th five-year public health and sanitation plan, 2017. Available: Accessed: 26 July 2021.

[38] QH Zhou, QW Yu, X Wang, PW Shi, QH Shen, and ZY Zhang. Are essential women’s healthcare services fully covered? A comparative analysis of policy documents in Shanghai and New York city from 1978-2017. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:4261 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18084261. [PMID:33920527]

[39] Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 2001.

[40] Baum C, Schaffer M. Actest: stata module to perform cumby–huizinga general test for autocorrelation in time series. Statistical Software Components, Department of Economics, Boston College; 2013.

[41] State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China. Chinese children’s development outline (2011-2020), 2011. Available: Accessed: 6 October 2021.

[42] The Central People’s Government of the People’s Republic of China. Notice on the national plan for the development of children in poverty-stricken area, 2014. Available: Accessed: 5 September 2021.

[43] The Central People’s Government of the People’s Republic of China. Measures for the screening of neonatal disease, 2009. Available: Accessed: 5 September 2021.

[44] SH Song and QY Meng. Analysis on equity of health resource allocation before and after new health system reform in China. Chin J Health Policy. 2017;10:46-50.

[45] Health Commission. Notice on printing and distributing opinions on strengthening the reform and development of children’s medical and health service, 2016. Available: Accessed: 8 October 2021.

[46] YH Huang, XL Xue, and XX Huang. Analysis on human resources of maternal and child health care institutions in Fujian province from 2009 to 2014. Strait J Prev Med. 2016;22:66-8.

[47] YF Yang. The development and challenges of today’s children’s health care. Chin J Child Health Care. 2013;21:1-5.

[48] K Sun, WQ Yin, DM Huang, QQ Yu, YK Zhao, and YW Li. Studying on the variation tendency of stability of doctors in primary medical institutions before and after the new medical reform and its influencing factors. Chin Health Serv Manag. 2016;33:912-4.

[49] JP Wang, R Luo, X Jin, K Wang, and WL Hu. Analysis on human status and demand in MCH institution in China. Chin J Women Child Health. 2014;5:1-5.

[50] Department of Maternal and Child Health and Community Health, Ministry of Health. Review of the development of China’s maternal and child health. Compilation of research project results on maternal and child health policy. Beijing: Ministry of Health; 2016.

[51] QQ Geng, JX Yang, XC Xu, CL Pan, CH Xu, and W Yang. Implementation of basic public health services for children in three provinces. Chin J Child Health Care. 2016;24:141-3.

[52] X Wang, L Li, X Gao, HY Jia, Z Zhang, and J Zuo. Role of health strategy on clarification of department responsibility in maternal health care in Beijing and Shanghai. Chin J Publ Health. 2020;36:1608-10.

[53] Shanghai Municipal Health Commission. Notice on the issuance of the implementation plan of the shanghai national nutrition plan (2019-2030), 2019. Available: Accessed: 6 October 2021.

[54] JM Qin. Progress in basic public health service projects in China. Chin J Publ Health. 2017;33:1289-97.

[55] JA Staples, G Liu, JR Brubacher, A Karimuddin, and JM Sutherland. Physician financial incentives to reduce unplanned hospital readmissions: an interrupted time series analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36:3431-40. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-06803-8. [PMID:33948803]

[56] J Lopez Bernal, S Cummins, and A Gasparrini. The use of controls in interrupted time series studies of public health interventions. Int J Epidemiol. 2018;47:2082-93. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyy135. [PMID:29982445]

Correspondence to:
Chengyue Li
Research Institute of Health Development Strategies
Fudan University
No.2 Yitaili Building, Room 606
No.446 Zhaojiabang Road
Shanghai 200032
[email protected]
Mo Hao
Research Institute of Health Development Strategies
Fudan University
No.2 Yitaili Building, Room 606
No.446 Zhaojiabang Road
Shanghai 200032
[email protected]