IMPACT: Google Scholar: H5-Index = 69; H5-Median = 102 (12th in the World in Public Health); Web of Science/Clarivate: Impact factor = 5.8 (5-year) / 5.5 (2-year); Scopus: Citescore = 6.2

Articles

Prevalence of abnormal spirometry and correlates of lung function decline among a population in rural Uganda

Marvah Hill Pierre-Louis1, Yiqi Qian2, Emily N Satinsky3, Edwin Nuwagira4, Charles Baguma4, Patience Ayebare4, Patrick Gumisiriza 4, Megan Lam2, Mi-Sun Lee5, David C Christiani1 5 6, Stephen Asiimwe3 4, Bernard Kakuhikire4, Alexander C Tsai3 4 6, Mark J Siedner2 4 6 7 8, Crystal M North1 2 5 6

1 Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

2 Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

3 Center for Global Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

4 Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda

5 Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

6 Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

7 Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

8 Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

DOI: 10.7189/jogh.16.04267
Cite as: Pierre-Louis MH, Qian Y, Satinsky EN, Nuwagira E, Baguma C, Ayebare P, Gumisiriza P, Lam M, Lee MS, Christiani DC, Asiimwe S, Kakuhikire B, Tsai AC, Siedner MJ, North CM. Prevalence of abnormal spirometry and correlates of lung function decline among a population in rural Uganda. J Glob Health. 2026;16:04267.
Keywords: chronic lung disease, COPD, asthma, pulmonary function testing, resource-limited setting(s)

(11 pages)

Share:

Abstract

Background

Chronic lung disease, which is the third leading cause of death globally, places a disproportionate burden of morbidity and mortality on sub-Saharan Africa, where limited infrastructure results in a lack of understanding of how lung function changes over time, whether it varies among susceptible populations, or whether at-risk individuals could be identified before abnormal lung function develops. To address this gap, we aimed to characterise lung function patterns and identify correlates of lung function decline in rural Uganda.

Methods

Adults completed health questionnaires and American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society-acceptable spirometry up to three times over four years (2015–2019). Our primary outcome was lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second (EV1) and FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC)); our secondary outcome was spirometry patterns. We characterised baseline patterns using Global Lung Initiative (GLI)-Global prediction equations and identified correlates of decline using generalised mixed effects linear regression. We then explored effect modification by sex, smoking, and socioeconomic status using interaction terms, with inverse probability of treatment weights balancing baseline characteristics.

Results

A total of 902 participants completed 1,471 ATS/ERS-acceptable spirometry tests. Their median age was 35 years, 56% were women, 75% were never-smokers, and 31% experienced chronic respiratory symptoms. Abnormal lung function affected 14% of the cohort, more commonly women and those with respiratory symptoms. FEV1 declined by 10mL/year (95% CI = −17, −2), and FEV1/FVC declined by 0.006/year (95% CI = −0.008, −0.005) or 0.53% predicted/year (95% CI = −0.68, −0.37). Among those with normal baseline lung function, FEV1 and FEV1/FVC declined more rapidly (FEV1 −18mL/year; FEV1/FVC −0.66% predicted). There was no effect modification by sex, smoking, or SES.

Conclusions

Lung function decline may be more rapid in this young, mostly non-smoking population. Our findings extend the understanding of non-obstructive lung disease in sub-Saharan Africa and emphasise that risk persists despite normal spirometry. These data can inform regional public health strategies for risk mitigation, early disease detection, and building healthcare infrastructure for the growing population at risk for or living with chronic lung disease.

Chronic lung disease is the third leading cause of death globally, responsible for 3.9 million deaths and 112 million disability-adjusted life years annually [1]. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma are the most prevalent chronic lung diseases, affecting 480 million and 262 million people globally, respectively [2,3]. More recently, additional patterns of abnormal spirometry, referred to as preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm) and restrictive spirometry pattern have been the subject of increased investigations, as these patterns of abnormal spirometry are associated with incident respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, and increased morbidity and mortality [4,5].

The prevalence, risk factors, and morbidity and mortality of chronic lung disease are known to vary by region and gender. For example, the BOLD study, which is among the first global studies of lung disease burden, estimated an obstructive lung disease prevalence among men ranging from 6% in India to 23% in South Africa and among women from 4% in the Philippines to 21% in Sweden [6]. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis estimated that the prevalence of COPD in sub-Saharan Africa is 8% [7], which is higher than estimates for the USA [8] and Europe [9]. Indeed, by 2050, sub-Saharan Africa is projected to have the highest COPD prevalence in the world [2]. Similarly, there are 120 million people living with asthma in sub-Saharan Africa [10], nearly a third of whom may meet the criteria for severe asthma [11]. There is also regional variation in the influence of socioeconomic status (SES) on the burden of lung disease [6]. In high income countries, lower SES was found to be associated with poorer lung health [12]. Comparatively, data on the relationship between SES and lung health in low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs) are quite limited [13], with studies showing both higher [14] and lower [15] respiratory morbidity among those of lower SES.

Smoking is the leading risk factor for chronic lung disease among men and in high income countries, while air pollution is the leading risk factor for lung disease among women and in LMICs [16]. Tuberculosis and chronic HIV infection, common conditions in many LMICs, were also found to be associated with higher risk of chronic lung diseases and are important drivers of non-smoking chronic lung disease risk [17,18]. The prevalence, costs, and morbidity and mortality of chronic lung disease have rapidly increased over the last 30 years – disproportionately so in LMICs and particularly among women [1,16,19].

However, diagnosing lung disease requires equipment that is not widely available in many LMICs. Given the limited infrastructure available for tracking population lung health over time in these regions, few cohorts have attempted to characterise longitudinal lung health, leaving us with limited knowledge regarding how lung function changes over time, whether it varies among particularly susceptible populations, or whether at-risk populations could be identified prior to the development of abnormal lung function. To address these knowledge gaps, we measured serial lung function over four years within a well-characterised cohort of 902 adults living in rural Uganda to characterise lung function patterns and identify correlates of lung function decline.

METHODS

Adults who reported stable primary residence in Nyakabare Parish in southwestern Uganda were enumerated in a population census from 2014 to 2015 [20], with parish residents who were at least 18 years of age invited to attend free health screening events that occurred in 2015, 2017, and 2019. Each health screening event lasted five days and was geographically distributed across three locations in the parish to ensure easy accessibility for all residents (Figure S1 in the Online Supplementary Document) [21]. At each health screening event, parish residents could consent to have their health information collected for research purposes. We included those who were at least 18 years old, attended at least one health screening event, and consented to have their health information collected for research purposes in this analytical cohort. We otherwise set no other exclusion criteria.

At each health screening event, participants completed health history questionnaires that included demographics, SES, medical history, smoking history, and respiratory symptoms. Study staff measured participants’ height using a stadiometer and weight using electronic scales, and body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters. We measured SES through a principal components analysis based upon a household asset index, in which ownership of more household assets defines greater wealth and thus higher SES [22]. Then, we created quintiles of asset ownership (and thus SES) from the asset ownership index, in which quintile 1 represented those with the most assets (i.e. the ‘richest’ quintile) and quintile 5 represented those with the least assets (i.e. the ‘poorest’ quintile). Chronic cough was defined as the presence of a cough on most days; for those diagnosed with chronic cough, we ascertained the frequency of sputum production. Chronic dyspnoea was defined as having difficulty breathing on most days.

Participants completed spirometry with the guidance of study staff using EasyOne® Plus handheld spirometers (nDD Medical Technologies, Andover, Massachusetts, USA) in accordance with American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS) standards. Spirometry was considered ATS/ERS acceptable if the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) from the two best manoeuvres were within 200 mL of one another. Per automated spirometer algorithms, participants with FEV1/FVC<0.7 completed repeat spirometry 10 minutes after receiving four puffs of albuterol (Ventolin, GlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA), the results of which we interpreted using Global Lung Initiative (GLI)-Global prediction equations and ATS/ERS interpretation guidelines [23,24] and only ATS/ERS-acceptable tests were included in the analytic cohort. For those with ATS/ERS acceptable post-bronchodilator spirometry, COPD was defined as a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < lower limit of normal (LLN) [23,24].

Statistical analysis

The primary outcome of interest was change in lung function (pre-bronchodilator FEV1 and FEV1/FVC), while the secondary outcome of interest was prevalence of abnormal spirometry, which included obstruction, spirometric restriction, and PRISm. We chose not to focus on change in FVC over time because FVC is more effort- and time-dependent than other spirometry metrics in field studies and therefore less reproducible over time [25,26].

To evaluate for selection bias, we compared baseline demographics between participants who had completed ATS/ERS-acceptable vs. unacceptable spirometry, and between participants in our final analytic cohort vs. participants excluded from our final analytic cohort. We tested all subgroup differences using Wilcoxon rank sum, chi-squared, or Fisher’s exact tests, as appropriate.

Similar to our prior work [21], we used inverse probability of treatment (IPT) weights to estimate population-representative estimates by reducing selection bias. We first estimated the propensity for parish adults to attend at least one health screening event using a logistic regression model consisting of census variables anticipated to correlate with event attendance. Variables included age, sex, education, village, self-reported overall health, and SES. Using this model, we calculated stabilised IPT weights [27] and incorporated these weights in our regression models.

We then summarised baseline demographics for the whole cohort and by sex, and the proportion of study participants with chronic respiratory symptoms and abnormal lung function, both with and without the weights. We considered each spirometry metric as an absolute value and as a percent predicted value based on GLI-Global prediction equations [24]. We categorised lung function as obstruction (FEV1/FVC<LLN) [23,28], spirometric restriction (FEV1/FVC ≥ LLN with FEV1 and FVC both < LLN), and preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm; FEV1/FVC ≥ LLN with FEV1 < 80% predicted) [23]. We chose our covariates of interest based on established associations with lung function, which included age, sex, height, smoking, occupation, education, and SES. We dichotomised occupation based upon the most prevalent self-reported occupations (subsistence farmers vs. all other employment types).

We then modelled lung function trajectories using IPT-weighted generalised mixed effects linear regression models adjusted for age at baseline, sex, height, smoking, occupation, education, and SES. Models accounted for intra-cluster correlations within participants and allowed for subject-specific baseline lung function using random intercepts. We evaluated for evidence of effect modification on the change in lung function over time by sex, smoking, and SES (dichotomised at median asset wealth) by including effect modifier × time product terms. Given that lung function increases until about 25 to 30 years of age [29], we evaluated the robustness of our results in sensitivity analyses restricted to participants at least 30 years of age and 40 years of age. To further test the robustness of our results, we performed additional sensitivity analyses excluding those with abnormal lung function at cohort entry. We applied a Bonferroni correction to provide strong control of familywise error (two lung function outcomes: P = 0.05/2 = 0.025 for). We conducted statistical analyses using SAS, version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Carey, North Carolina, USA), R, version 4.4.1 (R Core Team, Vienna, Austria) and Stata, version 17 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, Texas, USA).

RESULTS

Of the 2,245 adults living in Nyakabare Parish enumerated in the 2015, 2017, or 2019 population census, 1,246 (56%) attended at least one health screening event. Of the 1219 (98%) participants who had completed spirometry at least once during the four-year study period, 902 (74%) completed ATS/ERS-acceptable spirometry, had complete information on regression model covariates, and were thus included in the analytic cohort (Figure S2 in the Online Supplementary Document). Just over half of participants with ATS/ERS-acceptable spirometry (n = 479, 53%) attended only one health screening event, 277 (31%) attended two health screening events, and 146 (16%) attended all three health screening events. Participants who had completed ATS/ERS-acceptable spirometry were more educated, had higher BMI, and more commonly worked as subsistence farmers than participants who did not complete ATS/ERS-acceptable spirometry (Table S1 in the Online Supplementary Document). Participants in the final analytic cohort were slightly older, more educated, more commonly worked as subsistence farmers, and had higher BMI than participants excluded from the final analytic cohort (Table S2 in the Online Supplementary Document).

Using IPT weights to estimate population-level data (Figure S3, Panels A and B in the Online Supplementary Document), the baseline median age was 35 years old (interquartile range (IQR) = 26, 49), 56% were women, most of the population (75%) had never smoked, and 60% completed at least a primary school education (Table 1). Most participants had either a normal BMI (59%) or were overweight (25%), and subsistence farming was the most common occupation (65%). Compared to men, women smoked less (P < 0.001), were less educated (P < 0.001), were more commonly subsistence farmers (P < 0.001), and had higher BMI (P < 0.001). Among those who had completed health history questionnaires, few had a known diagnosis of asthma (2%) or COPD (1%).

Table 1. Baseline cohort characteristics and population characteristics*
Total cohort (n = 902)Weighted estimatesWomen (n = 557)Weighted estimatesMen (n = 345)Weighted estimatesP-value†
Age in years, Mdn (IQR)40 (29, 53)35 (26, 49)38 (29, 51)35 (27, 49)42 (31, 54)36 (26, 49)0.553
Women557 (62)56557 (100)1000 (0)0<0.0001
Smoking history<0.0001
Never640 (71)75449 (81)84191 (56)63
Former175 (20)1689 (16)1386 (25)20
Current82 (9)916 (3)366 (19)17
Years smoked, Mdn (IQR)‡21 (10, 32)21 (9, 32)7 (2, 10)7 (2, 10)25 (11, 33)23 (10, 32)0.0002
Education<0.0001
None124 (14)1199 (18)1625 (7)6
Some primary school299 (33)28196 (35)30103 (30)26
Completed primary school236 (26)25131 (24)22105 (30)29
At least some secondary school243 (27)35131 (24)32112 (32)39
Subsistence farming628 (71)65445 (81)78183 (53)48<0.0001
Socioeconomic status0.094
Poorest186 (21)20124 (22)2262 (18)18
Poorer183 (20)19114 (21)1969 (20)19
Average182 (20)20118 (21)2264 (19)19
Richer192 (21)20116 (21)2076 (22)21
Richest157 (17)2083 (15)1774 (21)24
BMI in kg/m2<0.0001
Underweight (<18.5)53 (6)520 (4)233 (10)8
Normal (18.5–25)498 (55)59241 (43)24257 (74)77
Overweight (25.1–30)235 (26)25192 (34)3443 (12)12
Obese (≥30)116 (13)12104 (19)1812 (3)3
Medical comorbidities
COPD4 (1)11 (0)03 (2)10.247
Asthma9 (2)25 (1)14 (2)20.314
HIV25 (5)417 (6)58 (4)30.453
Diabetes14 (3)28 (2)26 (3)20.943

BMI – body mass index, COPD – chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, IQR – interquartile range, Mdn – median

*Presented as n (%) or % (for weighted estimates) unless specified otherwise. Data were missing for ≤5% of participants for all covariates other than the following: COPD: 371 participants (41%); asthma: 364 participants (40%); HIV: 423 participants (47%); diabetes: 364 participants (40%). For these covariates, the above percentage distributions are restricted to participants without missing data.

†Continuous variables were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Categorical variables were compared using chi-squared tests. All comparisons were weighted.

‡Among current or former smokers only.

Respiratory symptoms were common (Table 2). Nearly a third (31%) of study participants reported chronic cough or chronic dyspnoea, both of which were more common among women than men (P = 0.002 and P = 0.021, respectively). Nearly two thirds (63%) of those with chronic cough reported sputum production on most days. In terms of baseline lung function, median FEV1 was 2607 mL (interquartile range (IQR) = 2150, 3152), median FVC was 3212 mL (IQR = 2,712, 3,817), and median FEV1/FVC was 0.82 (IQR = 0.78, 0.86). About 86% of the study cohort had normal spirometry throughout the study period, which was less common among women than men (83% vs. 91%; P = 0.002) and among those with vs. without respiratory symptoms (78% vs. 91%; P < 0.0001). The proportion of the study population with obstruction (7%), restriction (1%), and PRISm (1%) did not differ between women and men, but the proportion of the population with combined restriction and PRISm was significantly higher among women than men (6% vs. 1%; P = 0.0002). Among those with pre-bronchodilator obstruction, 84% completed ATS/ERS-acceptable post-bronchodilator spirometry, of whom 44% had post-bronchodilator obstruction, with no difference between men and women (50% vs. 39%; P = 0.432).

Table 2. Baseline unadjusted and population-weighted respiratory health*
Total cohort (n = 902)Weighted estimatesWomen (n = 557)Weighted estimatesMen (n = 345)Weighted estimatesP-value†
Respiratory symptoms
Any symptoms‡290 (32)31206 (37)3784 (25)23<0.0001
Chronic dyspnea157 (18)17109 (20)2048 (14)130.021
Chronic cough208 (23)22144 (26)2664 (19)170.002
Sputum production§123 (61)6378 (56)5845 (71)730.052
Lung function
FEV1, mL2,469 (2,048, 2,988)2,607(2,150, 3152)2,256 (1,900, 2,553)2,309 (1,942, 2,607)3,040 (2,612, 3501)3,195 (2,712, 3,587)<0.0001
FVC, mL3,082 (2,584, 3,648)3,212 (2,712, 3,817)2,766 (2,374, 3,131)2,810 (2,430, 3,169)3,800 (3,346, 4,200)3,849 (3,441, 4,244)<0.0001
FEV1/FVC0.81 (0.77, 0.85)0.82 (0.78, 0.86)0.81 (0.77, 0.85)0.82 (0.78, 0.85)0.81 (0.76, 0.85)0.83 (0.78, 0.86)0.164
Normal spirometry772 (86)86461 (83)83311 (90)910.002
Obstruction only¶66 (7)744 (8)822 (6)60.393
Restriction only7 (1)12 (0)05 (1)10.113
PRISm only¶14 (2)112 (2)22 (1)00.063
PRISm + restriction¶43 (5)438 (7)65 (1)10.0002

ATS – American Thoracic Society, COPD – chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, FEV1 – forced expiratory volume in one second, FVC – forced vital capacity, IQR – interquartile range, LLN – lower limit of normal, Mdn – median, PRISm – preserved ratio impaired spirometry

*Presented as n (%) or % (for weighted estimates) unless specified otherwise. Data were missing for ≤5% of participants for all covariates. The above percentage distributions are restricted to participants without missing data. Unweighted percentages may not sum to 100% due to rounding. Weighted percentages reflect the individual-level sampling weights and may not sum exactly to 100%.

†Continuous variables were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Categorical variables were compared using chi-squared tests. P-values compare weighed estimates among women vs. men.

‡Defined as reporting chronic dyspnea or chronic cough.

§Ascertained only among those with chronic cough, and the proportion represents the proportion of participants with chronic cough who reported sputum production on most days.

¶Obstruction and PRISm were defined using FEV1/FVC<LLN criteria

In adjusted models, FEV1 declined by −10mL/year (95% confidence interval, CI = −17, −2, P = 0.009) and FEV1/FVC by −0.006/year (95% CI = −0.008, −0.005, P < 0.0001). In models using percent predicted values, FEV1/FVC declined by −0.53% predicted/year (95% CI = −0.68, −0.37, P < 0.0001), while the yearly decline in FEV1% predicted was not statistically significant (Table 3; Figure S3 and Table S3 in the Online Supplementary Document). Interestingly, when restricting the analytic cohort to the 772 individuals with normal lung function at cohort entry, FEV1 and FEV1/FVC declines were even more rapid than the those observed in the whole cohort (FEV1 = −18mL/year; FEV1/FVC = −0.66% predicted (Table S4 in the Online Supplementary Document). As expected, in the sensitivity analyses limited to older individuals, the annual FEV1 decline was the more rapid (e.g. annual FEV1 decline = −20mL/year among those at least 40 years old), although the FEV1/FVC decline was unchanged (Table S5 in the Online Supplementary Document). We found no evidence for effect modification on the change in lung function over time by sex, smoking, or SES (Figure 1, Table 3).

Table 3. Population-weighted annual lung function decline among adults living in rural Uganda (n = 902)*
ΔFEV1 (mL)ΔFEV1 (% pred)ΔFEV1/FVCΔFEV1/FVC (% pred)
β (95% CI)P-valueβ (95% CI)P-valueβ (95% CI)P-valueβ (95% CI)P-value
Change per year−10 (−17, −2)0.010.28 (−0.02, 0.55)0.05(−0.008, −0.005)<0.001−0.53 (0.68, −0.37)<0.001
Lung function trajectory (per study visit) in stratified models
β (95% CI)β (95% CI)β (95% CI)β (95% CI)
Sex
Women−12 (−21, −3)0.010.17 (−0.19, 0.52)0.36−0.007 (−0.008, −0.005)<0.001−0.56 (−0.76, −0.37)<0.001
Men−6 (−18, 6)0.360.48 (0.003, 0.95)0.05−0.006 (−0.008, −0.004)<0.001−0.46 (−0.72, −0.20)0.001
P-value for interaction0.420.310.360.55
Smoking
Ever smokers−9 (−24, 6)0.260.45 (−0.13, 1.03)0.13−0.005 (−0.008, −0.003)<0.001−0.50 (−0.81, −0.18)0.002
Never smokers−10 (−19, −2)0.020.22 (−0.11, 0.55)0.19−0.007 (−0.008, −0.005)<0.001−0.54 (−0.72, −0.36)<0.001
P-value for interaction0.850.510.380.82
SES
Lower SES−1 (−13, 10)0.820.58 (0.15, 1.02)0.01−0.005 (−0.007, −0.004)<0.001−0.40 (−0.64, −0.16)0.001
Higher SES−17 (−27, −7)0.0010.04 (−0.35, 0.43)0.86−0.007 (−0.009, −0.005)<0.001−0.63 (−0.85, −0.42)<0.001
P-value for interaction0.050.070.200.15

CI – confidence interval, FEV1 – forced expiratory volume in one second, in millilitres, FVC – forced vital capacity, in millilitres, SES – socioeconomic status, β – beta coefficient

*All models adjusted for age at baseline, sex, height, smoking, occupation, education, and SES (dichotomised at median wealth based on asset ownership index).

Figure 1. Forest plot of change in lung function per visit and 95% CI among adults living in rural Uganda (n = 902). CI – confidence interval, FEV1 – forced expiratory volume in one second, in milliliters, FVC – forced vital capacity, in milliliters, SES – socioeconomic status.

FEV1 and FEV1/FVC were lower among older adults (per additional year in age: FEV1 = −20mL; 95% CI = −22, −18; FEV1/FVC = −0.002; 95% CI = −0.002, −0.002), among women vs. men (FEV1 = −559 mL; 95% CI = −629, −488; FEV1% predicted = −7.45; 95% CI = −10.23, −4.67; FEV1/FVC % predicted = −1.48; 95% CI = −2.79, −0.16), and among ever smokers vs. never smokers (FEV1/FVC = −0.010; 95% CI = −0.018, −0.002; FEV1/FVC % predicted = −1.28; 95% CI = −2.26, −0.30). Relationships between SES and lung function metrics were not statistically significant (Table S3 in the Online Supplementary Document).

DISCUSSION

In this population-based cohort of 902 mostly non-smoking young adults in rural Uganda who had completed 1,471 ATS/ERS-acceptable spirometry tests across four years, we found that nearly a third of the population reported chronic respiratory symptoms and 14% had abnormal spirometry, both of which were more common among women. We also found that the annual FEV1 decline was similar to published estimates [30], while the FEV1/FVC declined more rapidly than published estimates, with no evidence of effect modification by sex, smoking, or SES. Importantly, participants with normal lung function at cohort entry had an even more rapid FEV1 and FEV1/FVC decline compared to the whole cohort. The coexistence of prevalent respiratory symptoms and a more rapid FEV1 and FEV1/FVC decline in this relatively young rural population, particularly among those with normal lung function on initial testing, highlights a vulnerable population at increased future risk of lung disease. Our results add to the literature in several important ways.

There are only a few other population-based longitudinal studies of lung function in sub-Saharan Africa to which we can compare our results. Among 675 adults in Malawi who had completed spirometry twice over five years, FEV1 decline was 46.1mL/year, while the FEV1/FVC decline was not reported in the article [31]. The participants in the Malawian cohort were generally older than those in our study, and since lung function decline accelerates with age [32], this may explain the faster FEV1 decline in the Malawi study. However, FEV1 decline among mostly non-smoking older adults in the USA, Europe, and Australia ranged from 9.9 to 56 mL/year [32], suggesting that the lower FEV1 decline in our cohort may represent regional variation across Africa. To date, the Framingham Offspring Cohort is the only other study to have reported on the population-level longitudinal FEV1/FVC decline, placing it at 0.0029/year over a median of 17 years among 1,332 participants [33], which half that of our cohort estimate. This is an important finding because rapid FEV1/FVC decline was found to be associated with incident COPD and higher respiratory and all-cause mortality [34]. Furthermore, nearly one third of our participants reported chronic respiratory symptoms, most of whom had normal lung function, which is consistent with our prior work [21]. While it is possible that those with respiratory symptoms have undiagnosed parenchymal lung disease, respiratory symptoms with normal spirometry could be associated with incident COPD [35] and may represent an increasingly recognised risk group identified as ‘pre-COPD’ [36], meaning they are recognised to be at a crucial time point at which interventions to prevent disease could be the most influential. Indeed, the lung function decline in our cohort was the fastest among those with normal lung function. Together, these results emphasise that this population of Ugandan adults with mostly normal lung function carries significant risk of future respiratory morbidity and mortality.

Our lower-than-anticipated estimates of the prevalence of non-obstructive abnormal spirometry and the higher prevalence among women than men add to a small but growing body of literature characterising non-obstructive spirometry patterns in sub-Saharan Africa, though direct comparisons to our results are challenged by variations in spirometry prediction equations. In a cross-sectional analysis of 3,580 Ugandan adults, the prevalence of PRISm (defined using a fixed FEV1/FVC ratio) was 16%, with higher odds of the pattern occurring among women as compared to men [37]. Among 749 Malawian adults, restrictive spirometry pattern (defined using locally derived prediction equations) was present among 9% of the sample, yet no data were provided on differences by sex [38]. In Cameroon, 18.8% of 1,003 adults were found to have restrictive spirometry pattern, also defined using locally derived prediction equations [39]. In the BOLD study, in which the authors used NHANES III Caucasian prediction equations to define spirometry abnormalities, restrictive spirometry prevalence was 46.5% in South Africa, 47.6% in Malawi, and 70.7% in Nigeria [40]. Lastly, among 339 Ugandan adults who had recovered from pneumonia, 31% had PRISm, with the odds of the pattern occurring being higher among women [41]. The higher prevalence of PRISm in this Ugandan cohort compared to ours likely stems from the entirety of the cohort having had pneumonia. In our study, abnormal spirometry was more common among women than men – a difference driven largely by more prevalent combined PRISm and restriction. Whether this observation relates to differences in exposures (e.g. more air pollution), susceptibility to lung disease, or a combination therein is an area of active investigation by our group and others. Furthermore, it may be the case that the lower-than-anticipated PRISm and restrictive spirometry prevalence estimates in the current study are due to the use of different lung function prediction questions, as was demonstrated in a Nigerian population [42], or the use of LLN thresholds to define normal lung function. In the future, standardised recommendations for the use of LLN thresholds to define normal lung function among younger populations could facilitate comparisons across study cohorts.

Several of our findings are consistent with the published literature. For example, our estimates for the prevalence of obstruction are consistent with COPD estimates in Uganda, which range from 1.7% to 16% [21,43–45]. Our estimates, however, are higher than those put forward by prior cross-sectional work by our group among a subset of the current study population, in which obstruction prevalence was 2.3% [21]. In this prior work, we defined COPD using a fixed FEV1/FVC ratio, which underestimates obstruction in younger populations. Although annual lung function decline did not differ among sub-populations, we did find cross-sectional FEV1 and FEV1/FVC to be lower among older individuals and among women, and FEV1/FVC to be lower among current/former smokers, all of which is consistent with published literature [32,46,47].

Lastly, our results emphasise the importance of non-smoking exposures and lung disease in East Africa. Abnormal lung function was prevalent despite three quarters of the population having never smoked. Furthermore, those who had never smoked had similar lung function decline as current/former smokers, which may reflect the low pack-years among current/former smokers in the region [48]. These results are consistent with recent global estimates suggesting that smoking is not the main driver of lung disease in LMICs and highlight the importance of focusing on regional drivers of lung function decline, such as air pollution and post-tuberculosis lung disease [49,50]. Work to reduce lung disease risk among at-risk populations must focus on non-smoking risk factors to appropriately target the highest risk exposures in the region.

The strength of this study lies in its prospective design, the population-based sample in which IPT weighting was used to reduce selection bias, and the use of spirometry to objectively measure lung function. Our study also has some limitations. Participants chose to participate in the study, even though this meant they had to organise their own transportation to the free health screening event. This may have resulted in a healthier cohort, though this risk was offset with IPT weights to reduce bias. Not all participants completed ATS/ERS-acceptable post-bronchodilator spirometry, so we were unable to differentiate between COPD and asthma among those with pre-bronchodilator obstruction. In the absence of body plethysmography, we were unable to measure total lung capacity and thus could not confirm that the restrictive spirometry pattern represented restrictive lung disease. HIV serostatus and prior tuberculosis are both important drivers of chronic lung disease in sub-Saharan Africa [51,52], but were missing among nearly half of the study population. Furthermore, among those with non-missing values, these data points were collected by voluntary self-report, as neither confirmatory testing (for HIV) nor national treatment cards (for tuberculosis) were available. As such, we were unable to evaluate the extent to which chronic HIV infection or post-tuberculosis lung disease contribute to abnormal lung function patterns or lung function decline in rural Uganda. There were also no data available on environmental risks such as air pollution exposure, which limits our ability to explore the extent to which air pollution exposure influences lung function decline. With that said, our prior work confirms that prior TB is associated with subsequent lung dysfunction [50,53], that people with HIV have accelerated loss of lung function [54], that most people in the study region use biomass fuels for cooking and that regional air pollution is higher than international standards [49,55]. Lastly, as a single-region study, our results may not be generalisable beyond the East African setting.

CONCLUSIONS

Respiratory symptoms are common and lung function decline may be more rapid in this population of young, mostly non-smoking adults in rural Uganda. This work extends our understanding of non-obstructive lung disease burden in sub-Saharan Africa and highlights that lung disease risk persists despite normal spirometry. These data can inform public health strategies focused on risk mitigation, early disease detection, and developing the requisite healthcare infrastructure for the growing population of people with chronic lung disease in sub-Saharan Africa.

Additional material

Online Supplementary Document

Acknowledgement: We thank the study participants living in the Nyakabare Parish of Uganda for their participation in this research study. We also thank all the team members of the MUST Global Health Collaborative and the MUST Grants Office, and all the volunteers for their dedication and hard work during the health fairs. This work would not have been possible without them.

Ethics statement: Study procedures were approved by the Mbarara University of Science and Technology (#07/10-12), and Mass General Brigham (#2013P000395) research ethics committees, and research clearance was obtained from the Ugandan National Council for Science and Technology and the Research Secretariat in the Office of the President of Uganda. All study participants provided written informed consent in the form of a signature or (due to limited literacy) a fingerprint. For participants with limited literacy, the consent form was read aloud by study staff.

Data availability: De-identified data can be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Funding: This study was funded by US National Institutes of Health R01MH125667 (ACT), K23HL154863 (CMN), K24 HL166024 (MJS) and K24DA061696 (ACT), and by Friends of a Healthy Uganda. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the US National Institutes of Health or other funders. Funding sources had no role in study conception, design, data collection, data analysis, manuscript review, or decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Authorship contributions: CMN and DCC conceived of the study design. CB, PA, PG, and BK oversaw data collection. CMN, DCC, MJS, and MSL provided methodological guidance. YQ and ML oversaw data analysis. MHPL wrote the first draft of the manuscript. ATS, EN, and SA provided input during manuscript writing and editing. All co-authors provided substantial contributions to the published manuscript and have approved its final version.

Disclosure of interest: The authors completed the ICMJE Disclosure of Interest Form (available upon request from the corresponding author) and disclose the following activities and/or relationships: ACT reports receiving a financial honorarium from Elsevier for his work as Co-Editor in Chief of the Elsevier-owned journal SSM – Mental Health. The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest.

references

  1. GBD Chronic Respiratory Disease Collaborators. Prevalence and attributable health burden of chronic respiratory diseases, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8:585–96. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30105-3 PMID: 32526187
  2. Boers E, Barrett M, Su JG, Benjafield AV, Sinha S, Kaye L, et al.. Global Burden of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Through 2050. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6:e2346598. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.46598 PMID: 38060225
  3. Wang Z, Li Y, Gao Y, Fu Y, Lin J, Lei X, et al.. Global, regional, and national burden of asthma and its attributable risk factors from 1990 to 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Respir Res. 2023;24:169. doi: 10.1186/s12931-023-02475-6 PMID: 37353829
  4. Godfrey MS, Jankowich MD. The Vital Capacity Is Vital: Epidemiology and Clinical Significance of the Restrictive Spirometry Pattern. Chest. 2016;149:238–51. doi: 10.1378/chest.15-1045 PMID: 26356330
  5. Wijnant SRA, Roos ED, Kavousi M, Stricker BH, Terzikhan N, Lahousse L, et al.. Trajectory and mortality of preserved ratio impaired spirometry: the Rotterdam Study. Eur Respir J. 2020;55:1901217. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01217-2019 PMID: 31601717
  6. Buist AS, McBurnie MA, Vollmer WM, Gillespie S, Burney P, Mannino DM, et al.. International variation in the prevalence of COPD (The BOLD Study): a population-based prevalence study. Lancet. 2007;370:741–50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61377-4 PMID: 17765523
  7. Awokola BI, Amusa GA, Jewell CP, Okello G, Stobrink M, Finney LJ, et al.. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in sub-Saharan Africa. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2022;26:232–42. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.21.0394 PMID: 35197163
  8. Xu J, Murphy SL, Kockanek KD, Arias E. Mortality in the United States, 2018 – NCHS Data Brief No. 355. January 2020. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db355.htm. Accessed: 17 September 2025.
  9. Benjafield A, Tellez D, Barrett M, Gondalia R, Nunez C, Wedzicha J, et al.. An estimate of the European prevalence of COPD in 2050. Eur Respir J. 2021;58 suppl 65:OA2866. doi: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2021.OA2866
  10. Adeloye D, Chan KY, Rudan I, Campbell H. An estimate of asthma prevalence in Africa: a systematic analysis. Croat Med J. 2013;54:519–31. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2013.54.519 PMID: 24382846
  11. Kirenga BJ, Chakaya J, Yimer G, Nyale G, Haile T, Muttamba W, et al.. The burden of severe asthma in sub-Saharan Africa: Findings from the African Severe Asthma Project. J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2024;3:100209. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2024.100209 PMID: 38328803
  12. Polak M, Szafraniec K, Kozela M, Wolfshaut-Wolak R, Bobak M, Pająk A. Socioeconomic status and pulmonary function, transition from childhood to adulthood: cross-sectional results from the polish part of the HAPIEE study. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e022638. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022638 PMID: 30782683
  13. Williams J, Allen L, Wickramasinghe K, Mikkelsen B, Roberts N, Townsend N. A systematic review of associations between non-communicable diseases and socioeconomic status within low- and lower-middle-income countries. J Glob Health. 2018;8:020409. doi: 10.7189/jogh.08.020409 PMID: 30140435
  14. Burkart K, Khan MH, Krämer A, Breitner S, Schneider A, Endlicher WR. Seasonal variations of all-cause and cause-specific mortality by age, gender, and socioeconomic condition in urban and rural areas of Bangladesh. Int J Equity Health. 2011;10:32. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-10-32 PMID: 21816075
  15. Grigsby M, Siddharthan T, Chowdhury MA, Siddiquee A, Rubinstein A, Sobrino E, et al.. Socioeconomic status and COPD among low- and middle-income countries. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016;11:2497–507. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S111145 PMID: 27785006
  16. Li X, Cao X, Guo M, Xie M, Liu X. Trends and risk factors of mortality and disability adjusted life years for chronic respiratory diseases from 1990 to 2017: systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. BMJ. 2020;368:m234. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m234 PMID: 32075787
  17. Fan H, Wu F, Liu J, Zeng W, Zheng S, Tian H, et al.. Pulmonary tuberculosis as a risk factor for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Transl Med. 2021;9:390. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-4576 PMID: 33842611
  18. Bigna JJ, Kenne AM, Asangbeh SL, Sibetcheu AT. Prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the global population with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6:e193–202. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30451-5 PMID: 29254748
  19. Mei F, Dalmartello M, Bonifazi M, Bertuccio P, Levi F, Boffetta P, et al.. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) mortality trends worldwide: An update to 2019. Respirology. 2022;27:941–50. doi: 10.1111/resp.14328 PMID: 35831204
  20. Tsai AC, Kakuhikire B, Perkins JM, Downey JM, Baguma C, Satinsky EN, et al.. Normative vs personal attitudes toward persons with HIV, and the mediating role of perceived HIV stigma in rural Uganda. J Glob Health. 2021;11:04956. doi: 10.7189/jogh.11.04056 PMID: 34552725
  21. North CM, Kakuhikire B, Vořechovská D, Hausammann-Kigozi S, McDonough AQ, Downey J, et al.. Prevalence and correlates of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic respiratory symptoms in rural southwestern Uganda: a cross-sectional, population-based study. J Glob Health. 2019;9:010434. doi: 10.7189/jogh.09.010434 PMID: 31217961
  22. Smith ML, Kakuhikire B, Baguma C, Rasmussen JD, Bangsberg DR, Tsai AC. Do household asset wealth measurements depend on who is surveyed? Asset reporting concordance within multi-adult households in rural Uganda. J Glob Health. 2020;10:010412. PMID: 32373331
  23. Stanojevic S, Kaminsky DA, Miller MR, Thompson B, Aliverti A, Barjaktarevic I, et al.. ERS/ATS technical standard on interpretive strategies for routine lung function tests. Eur Respir J. 2022;60:2101499. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01499-2021 PMID: 34949706
  24. Bowerman C, Bhakta NR, Brazzale D, Cooper BR, Cooper J, Gochicoa-Rangel L, et al.. A Race-neutral Approach to the Interpretation of Lung Function Measurements. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023;207:768–74. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202205-0963OC PMID: 36383197
  25. Graham BL, Steenbruggen I, Miller MR, Barjaktarevic IZ, Cooper BG, Hall GL, et al.. Standardization of Spirometry 2019 Update. An Official American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society Technical Statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;200:e70–88. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201908-1590ST PMID: 31613151
  26. Quanjer PH, Stanojevic S, Cole TJ, Baur X, Hall GL, Culver BH, et al.. Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3–95-yr age range: the global lung function 2012 equations. Eur Respir J. 2012;40:1324–43. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00080312 PMID: 22743675
  27. Cole SR, Hernán MA. Constructing inverse probability weights for marginal structural models. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;168:656–64. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn164 PMID: 18682488
  28. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. 2025 GOLD Report. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease – GOLD. Seattle, Washington, USA: Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease; 2025. Available: https://goldcopd.org/2025-gold-report/. Accessed: 17 September 2025.
  29. Sharma G, Goodwin J. Effect of aging on respiratory system physiology and immunology. Clin Interv Aging. 2006;1:253–60. doi: 10.2147/ciia.2006.1.3.253 PMID: 18046878
  30. Tang W, Kowgier M, Loth DW, Soler Artigas M, Joubert BR, Hodge E, et al.. Large-scale genome-wide association studies and meta-analyses of longitudinal change in adult lung function. PLoS One. 2014;9:e100776. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100776 PMID: 24983941
  31. Njoroge MW, Mjojo P, Chirwa C, Rylance S, Nightingale R, Gordon SB, et al.. Changing lung function and associated health-related quality-of-life: A five-year cohort study of Malawian adults. EClinicalMedicine. 2021;41:101166. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101166 PMID: 34712931
  32. Thomas ET, Guppy M, Straus SE, Bell KJL, Glasziou P. Rate of normal lung function decline in ageing adults: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e028150. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028150 PMID: 31248928
  33. Liao SY, Lin X, Christiani DC. Occupational exposures and longitudinal lung function decline. Am J Ind Med. 2015;58:14–20. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22389 PMID: 25384732
  34. Choi KY, Lee HJ, Lee JK, Park TY, Heo EY, Kim DK, et al.. Rapid FEV1/FVC Decline Is Related With Incidence of Obstructive Lung Disease and Mortality in General Population. J Korean Med Sci. 2023;38:e4. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e4 PMID: 36593688
  35. Lindberg A, Larsson LG, Rönmark E, Jonsson AC, Larsson K, Lundbäck B. Decline in FEV1 in Relation to Incident Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in a Cohort with Respiratory Symptoms. COPD. 2007;4:5–13. doi: 10.1080/15412550601168358 PMID: 17364672
  36. Han MK, Agusti A, Celli BR, Criner GJ, Halpin DMG, Roche N, et al.. From GOLD 0 to Pre-COPD. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021;203:414–23. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202008-3328PP PMID: 33211970
  37. Siddharthan T, Grealis K, Robertson NM, Lu M, Liu S, Pollard SL, et al.. Assessing the prevalence and impact of preserved ratio impaired spirometry in low-income and middle-income countries: a post-hoc cross-sectional analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2024;12:e1498–505. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00233-X PMID: 39151984
  38. Meghji J, Nadeau G, Davis KJ, Wang D, Nyirenda MJ, Gordon SB, et al.. Noncommunicable Lung Disease in Sub-Saharan Africa. A Community-based Cross-Sectional Study of Adults in Urban Malawi. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;194:67–76. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201509-1807OC PMID: 26788760
  39. Pefura-Yone EW, Balkissou AD, Kengne AP. Determinants of Restrictive Spirometric Pattern in a Sub-Saharan Urban Setting: A Cross-sectional Population-based Study. Open Respir Med J. 2016;10:86–95. doi: 10.2174/1874306401610010086 PMID: 28144367
  40. Kulbacka-Ortiz K, Triest FJJ, Franssen FME, Wouters EFM, Studnicka M, Vollmer WM, et al.. Restricted spirometry and cardiometabolic comorbidities: results from the international population based BOLD study. Respir Res. 2022;23:34. doi: 10.1186/s12931-022-01939-5 PMID: 35177082
  41. Abelman RA, Fitzpatrick J, Byanova KL, Zawedde J, Sanyu I, Byanyima P, et al.. Sex and HIV Differences in Preserved Ratio Impaired Spirometry (PRISm) Among Ugandans Postpneumonia. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024;11:ofae033. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae033 PMID: 38456193
  42. Obaseki DO, Erhabor GE, Awopeju OF, Adewole OO, Adeniyi BO, Buist EAS, et al.. Reduced Forced Vital Capacity in an African Population. Prevalence and Risk Factors. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14:714–21. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201608-598OC PMID: 28244800
  43. Robertson NM, Emily M, Pollard SL, Kalyesubula R, Surkan PJ, Siddharthan T, et al.. Urban-Rural Disparities in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Management and Access in Uganda. Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2019;6:17–28. PMID: 30775421
  44. Siddharthan T, Grigsby MR, Goodman D, Chowdhury M, Rubinstein A, Irazola V, et al.. Association between Household Air Pollution Exposure and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Outcomes in 13 Low- and Middle-Income Country Settings. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;197:611–20. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201709-1861OC PMID: 29323928
  45. van Gemert F, Kirenga B, Chavannes N, Kamya M, Luzige S, Musinguzi P, et al.. Prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and associated risk factors in Uganda (FRESH AIR Uganda): a prospective cross-sectional observational study. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3:e44–51. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70337-7 PMID: 25539969
  46. Dockery DW, Speizer FE, Ferris BG, Ware JH, Louis TA, Spiro A. Cumulative and reversible effects of lifetime smoking on simple tests of lung function in adults. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988;137:286–92. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/137.2.286 PMID: 3341623
  47. Ekström M, Schiöler L, Grønseth R, Johannessen A, Svanes C, Leynaert B, et al.. Absolute values of lung function explain the sex difference in breathlessness in the general population. Eur Respir J. 2017;49:1602047. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02047-2016 PMID: 28546280
  48. Mitton JA, North CM, Muyanja D, Okello S, Vořechovská D, Kakuhikire B, et al.. Smoking cessation after engagement in HIV care in rural Uganda. AIDS Care. 2018;30:1622–9. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2018.1484070 PMID: 29879856
  49. Onyango S, North CM, Ellaithy HA, Tumwesigye P, Kang CM, Matthaios V, et al.. Ambient PM2.5 Temporal Variation and Source Apportionment in Mbarara, Uganda. Aerosol Air Qual Res. 2024;24:230203. doi: 10.4209/aaqr.230203 PMID: 38947180
  50. North CM, Allen JG, Okello S, Sentongo R, Kakuhikire B, Ryan ET, et al.. HIV Infection, Pulmonary Tuberculosis, and COPD in Rural Uganda: A Cross-Sectional Study. Lung. 2018;196:49–57. doi: 10.1007/s00408-017-0080-8 PMID: 29260309
  51. Konstantinidis I, Zou RH, Papageorgiou SN, Ronit A, Drummond MB, Kunisaki KM, et al.. Effect of Human Immunodeficiency Virus on Lung Function and Structure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2025;22:274–84. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202404-384OC PMID: 39417747
  52. Gebremedhn AT, Bobosha K, Fantaye YA, Teferi MY, El-Khatib Z, Bukate TA, et al.. Prevalence and associated factors of post-tuberculosis lung disease in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pulm Med. 2025;26:55. doi: 10.1186/s12890-025-03887-4 PMID: 41437011
  53. Nuwagira E, Stadelman A, Baluku JB, Rhein J, Byakika-Kibwika P, Mayanja H, et al.. Obstructive lung disease and quality of life after cure of multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis in Uganda: a cross-sectional study. Trop Med Health. 2020;48:34. doi: 10.1186/s41182-020-00221-y PMID: 32476983
  54. McNeill J, Okello S, Sentongo R, Kakuhikire B, Tsai AC, Christiani DC, et al.. Chronic Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection Is Associated with Accelerated Decline of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second among Women but Not among Men: A Longitudinal Cohort Study in Uganda. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022;19:1779–83. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202111-1275RL PMID: 35767026
  55. North CM, MacNaughton P, Lai PS, Vallarino J, Okello S, Kakuhikire B, et al.. Personal carbon monoxide exposure, respiratory symptoms, and the potentially modifying roles of sex and HIV infection in rural Uganda: a cohort study. Environ Health Glob Access Sci Source. 2019;18:73. doi: 10.1186/s12940-019-0517-z PMID: 31429759

Correspondence to:
Dr Crystal M North, MD MPH
Massachusetts General Hospital
100 Cambridge Street, Suite 1600, Boston, MA 02114
USA
[email protected]